Re: Rebase options via git pull

[Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>]

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, May 14 2021, Sergey Organov wrote:
>
>> Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2021-05-13 18:49:03-0600, Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 7:23 AM Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hello,
>>>> >
>>>> > Is there a way to specify additional options for "git rebase" when it's
>>>> > invoked via:
>>>> >
>>>> >   git pull --rebase
>>>> >
>>>> > ? What if rebase is used implicitly due to "pull.rebase" being set
>>>> > accordingly?
>>>> >
>>>> > In particular, I'd like to be able to:
>>>> >
>>>> >   git pull --rebase --no-fork-point
>>>> >
>>>> > but it doesn't work.
>>>> 
>>>> It would be cumbersome, but you could run `git config rebase.forkPoint
>>>> false` before pulling and `git config rebase.forkPoint true` after.
>>>
>>> Or, for this *specific* case:
>>>
>>> 	git -c rebase.forkpoint=false pull --rebase
>>
>> That's nice, thanks! Doesn't solve entire issue, but definitely better
>> than nothing.
>>
>> Probably add generic cmd.<cmd>.opts config support, so that I can say:
>>
>>   git -c cmd.rebase.opts="--no-fork-point --empty=keep" pull --rebase
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> It's been discussed before (but I did not dig up the discussions,
> sorry). It's been considered a bad idea, because our commands are a
> mixture of plumbing/porcelain commands and switches, so we want to be
> able to reliably invoke say ls-tree with some switches internally,
> without config tripping us up.
>
> Of course we could make this sort of thing work by selectively ignoring
> the config, but such a thing would be equal in complexity to the effort
> of assering that it's safe to introduce new rebase.* config in the
> codebase for every switch it has now, but with a less friendly interface
> both for git itself and users.

I don't see much complexity here. We'd then just need to effectively
invoke ls-tree internally like this:

   git -c 'cmd.ls-tree.opts=' ls-tree

Not a big deal.

>
> I.e. instead of rebase.noForkPoint=<bool> we'd need to to getopt parsing
> on some cmd.rebase.opts string.

As this is meant to be generic, then yes, every command will first parse
corresponding config option, then command-line options, rebase not being
any different.

>
> I don't see why in this case what I suggested elsewhere in the thread
> wouldn't be viable, i.e. you specify --rebase or --merge to "pull", and
> that affects how we interpret the rest of the options. I haven't tried
> it though, so there may be hidden gotchas there I haven't thought of.

This is the best solution for "git pull" indeed, but the above is a
generic feature that could provide solution in cases like this, where
immediate specific solution is not (yet) available.

Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov