git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: diff-index --cc no longer permitted, gitk is now broken (slightly)
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:43:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmtjkwsj.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy288b64q.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 07 Sep 2021 11:19:33 -0700")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Here is a patch that fixes diff-index to accept --cc again:
>
> Sorry for the delay; I did not notice there was a patch buried in a
> discussion thread.
>
> We might later need to do this suppression in more codepaths if we
> find more regressions, but let's have one fix at a time.

I'm pretty positive there should be nothing left. This commit was
diff-index specific, and doesn't affect anything else. Nowhere in entire
series the semantics of --cc itself has been changed, it has been only
disabled as particular option in diff-index command-line parsing.
Overall, this is pretty local change.

>
> Will queue.
>
>>  builtin/diff-index.c |  6 +++---
>>  diff-merges.c        | 14 ++++----------
>>  diff-merges.h        |  2 +-
>
> This would deserve new tests that cover the existing use cases,
> given that both of us (and other reviewers in the original thread)
> did not notice how big a regression we are causing.

I don't see it as a "big regression", but no wonder the breakage was
entirely unexpected, see below.

>
> We care about --cc naturally falling back to -p when there is only
> one other thing to compare with, and also we care about --cc that
> allows us to compare during conflict resolution, at least, I think.

The problem here is not with -c/--cc itself, it is rather with
diff-index. It's neither documented nor tested nor obvious what -c/--cc
should mean in diff-index, given -c/--cc description (e.g., in "git help
log"):

       -c
           With this option, diff output for a merge commit shows the
           differences [...]

How an option to deal with merge commits is applicable to diff-index,
that:

    git-diff-index - Compare a tree to the working tree or index

???

Besides, nobody yet told us why gitk uses --cc option in invocation of
'diff-index' in the first place. Does it actually *rely* on particular
undocumented behavior of "diff-index --cc", or is it just a copy-paste
*leftover*?

Overall, the original commit had a mistake, as the commit that was meant
to be pure refactoring had changed observable behavior, even if
undocumented. However, the essence of the commit, disabling of "diff for
merge /commits/" options in diff-index that does not deal with /commits/,
could still be the right thing to do long term.

Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-08 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-30  8:03 diff-index --cc no longer permitted, gitk is now broken (slightly) Johannes Sixt
2021-08-30 13:05 ` Sergey Organov
2021-08-30 18:13   ` Jeff King
2021-08-30 20:01     ` Sergey Organov
2021-08-30 20:26   ` Johannes Sixt
2021-08-30 20:45     ` Sergey Organov
2021-08-30 17:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-30 17:40   ` Sergey Organov
2021-08-30 18:09   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-30 20:03     ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-01 16:52 ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-07 18:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-07 19:53     ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-08 13:43     ` Sergey Organov [this message]
2021-09-08 17:23       ` Johannes Sixt
2021-09-08 19:04         ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-09 17:07         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-09 20:07           ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-16  9:50       ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-16 21:15         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-16 22:41           ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-16 22:50             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-17  7:08               ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-17 16:32                 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-17 18:41                   ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-17 16:58                 ` Philip Oakley
2021-09-17 17:34                   ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-18 17:56                     ` Sergey Organov
2021-09-07 20:32   ` Johannes Sixt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pmtjkwsj.fsf@osv.gnss.ru \
    --to=sorganov@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).