From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: What is missing from Git v2.0 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 21:16:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4yua679.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <53557071.5040500@gmail.com> <5356c1a61f6d8_463e11ef310a5@nysa.notmuch> <20140422213039.GB21043@thunk.org> <5356e62feb9f3_6cbadd72f0f1@nysa.notmuch> <87y4yxc89r.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5358869b2937_59ed83d308fe@nysa.notmuch> <20140424133910.GA26427@inner.h.apk.li> <5359587cbe1bb_3241f112ecf8@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Andreas Krey , Git Mailing List To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 24 21:21:59 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WdPDZ-0004GV-Bh for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 21:21:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751839AbaDXTVp (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:21:45 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52684 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751810AbaDXTVo (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:21:44 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51724 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WdPDL-0002wz-44; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:21:43 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 577ABE0989; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 21:16:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <5359587cbe1bb_3241f112ecf8@nysa.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:31:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras writes: > Andreas Krey wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:35:55 +0000, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> ... >> > Anyway, if you disagree change one of your frequently used passwords to a >> > chapter of The Lord of the Rings for a day. Let's see if you still think >> > that. >> >> Proving that one extreme isn't the optimum doesn't prove the other is. > > It's called hyperbole, and it's a very common and very effective rhetorical > device. Let us conclude this discussion by declaring you the best rhetor then. -- David Kastrup