From: Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The meaning of x~0 and x~ as rev-spec.
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:21:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zlt1mdb9.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vwso5p92q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri\, 14 Mar 2008 09\:24\:45 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com> writes:
>
>> Testing suggests that <name>~0 and <name>~ are the same and are just
>> synonyms for <name> as rev-specs. Is that correct? Is that by design, or
>> by accident?
>
> sed -n -e '/name~3/,/x = 0;/p' sha1_name.c
OK, I'll send a patch for documentation.
-- Sergei.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-14 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-14 13:20 The meaning of x~0 and x~ as rev-spec Sergei Organov
2008-03-14 16:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-14 17:21 ` Sergei Organov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zlt1mdb9.fsf@osv.gnss.ru \
--to=osv@javad.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).