From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF1F1F4C0 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727640AbfJaNpb (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:45:31 -0400 Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk ([85.233.160.19]:61445 "EHLO smtp.hosts.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727569AbfJaNpb (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:45:31 -0400 Received: from [92.30.121.54] (helo=[192.168.1.22]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1iQAlV-0003TY-5S; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:45:29 +0000 Subject: Re: git branch --edit-description a custom file To: Johannes Schindelin , phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk Cc: Jeff King , Denton Liu , Git Mailing List References: <20191030183950.GA21277@generichostname> <20191030202835.GB29013@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20191030224328.GB44961@generichostname> <20191031061832.GA20830@sigill.intra.peff.net> <8b9021fa-f60c-a2e0-1174-a2fc1f11c476@gmail.com> From: Philip Oakley Message-ID: <9aa1cefc-daeb-e702-95ba-1e83f8f7dcfe@iee.email> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:45:31 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 31/10/2019 11:30, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > And while we're dreaming: it would be nice to discern between "push > upstreams" and "base upstreams". Example: when I work on the > `fix-t5516-flakiness` branch, I target `upstream/master`, but I push to > `dscho`, i.e. my "push upstream" is `dscho/fix-t5516-flakiness`. > > Ciao, > Dscho Yep, the triangular workflow of 'publish' v 'upstream' v 'local' is quite tricky. There is little user facing docs for that. Many of my branches have the wrong "upstream" in the sense that it's the push-publish remote that holds copies of my work (i.e. I manually select the push-remote every time;-), even though the branches are set to track the original start point's upstream. Philip