git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/15] Automatically reuse sparse limiting arguments in revision walking
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 17:12:07 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimw89nkui5UdJPu-s5yQ=mP4wtw0tKTZxsq2L4W@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ywOZfkxfr1Gt3AMMbWDphKjTBudG=E4+xer-P@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In a sparse repository, by automatically making use of sparse limits
>>> specified at clone time, we can avoid walking uninteresting commits and
>
>>
>> I have a nicer approach here. Instead of modifying setup_revisions()
>> and similar functions, I update get_pathspec() to rewrite the
>> pathspecs from command line in narrow/shallow repos. get_pathspec()
>> currently does some form of rewriting already (prepending prefix).
>>
>> So if you do "git log", get_pathspec() would return "git log -- PATH1
>> PATH2...". Will repost my series soon, or I can send that particular
>> patch to you.
>
> Ooh, that's clever.  I like it.  Do you also do verification that any
> paths specified by the user are a subset of the paths the sparse clone
> is limited to?  That'd be really nice.  Much better than my simple
> dumb "just append" logic.

I do.

> How do you reconcile conflicting needs, though?  For most cases,
> whenever the user specifies paths, get_pathspec should make sure those
> paths are a subset of the sparse paths (throwing an error if they're
> not) and then just use the user-specified ones.  However, I think
> doing this in all cases would break ls-files/cat-file -p, as the
> pathspecs passed to those are not necessarily rooted at the toplevel
> of the repository (and the prefix doesn't correct for that either).

Yes, some commands will just skip the pathspec rewrite. It's up to
those commands to rewrite pathspec themselves.

So get_pathspec() will have pathspec rewrite by default. Other
commands will use another variant of it (i.e. get_pathspec_narrow()),
which allows to skip the rewrite completely.
-- 
Duy

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-05  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-05  0:13 [RFC PATCH 00/15] Sparse clones Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] README-sparse-clone: Add a basic writeup of my ideas for sparse clones Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  3:01   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-05  3:13     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-06  3:14       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-05  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] Add tests for client handling in a sparse repository Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] Read sparse limiting args from $GIT_DIR/sparse-limit Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] When unpacking in a sparse repository, avoid traversing missing trees/blobs Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] read_tree_recursive: Avoid missing blobs and trees in a sparse repository Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  2:00   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-05  3:16     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  4:31       ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] Automatically reuse sparse limiting arguments in revision walking Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  1:58   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-05  4:50     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  7:12       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2010-09-05  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] cache_tree_update(): Capability to handle tree entries missing from index Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  7:54   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-05 21:09     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-06  4:42       ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-06  5:02         ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-06  4:47   ` [PATCH 0/4] en/object-list-with-pathspec update Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-09-06  4:47   ` [PATCH 1/4] Add testcases showing how pathspecs are ignored with rev-list --objects Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-09-06  4:47   ` [PATCH 2/4] tree-walk: copy tree_entry_interesting() as is from tree-diff.c Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-09-06 15:22     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-06 22:09       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-06  4:47   ` [PATCH 3/4] tree-walk: actually move tree_entry_interesting() to tree-walk.c Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-09-06 15:31     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-06 22:20       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-06 23:53         ` Junio C Hamano
2010-09-06  4:47   ` [PATCH 4/4] Make rev-list --objects work together with pathspecs Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-09-07  1:28   ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] cache_tree_update(): Capability to handle tree entries missing from index Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-09-07  3:06     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] cache_tree_update(): Require relevant tree to be passed Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] Add tests for communication dealing with sparse repositories Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] sparse-repo: Provide a function to record sparse limiting arguments Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] builtin-clone: Accept paths for sparse clone Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] Pass extra (rev-list) args on, at least in some cases Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] upload-pack: Handle extra rev-list arguments being passed Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] EVIL COMMIT: Include all commits Elijah Newren
2010-09-05  0:14 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] clone: Ensure sparse limiting arguments are used in subsequent operations Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTimw89nkui5UdJPu-s5yQ=mP4wtw0tKTZxsq2L4W@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).