From: Sean Allred <allred.sean@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Bug report - Can create worktrees from bare repo / such worktrees can fool is_bare_repository()
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 10:46:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABceR4bZmtC4rCwgxZ1BBYZP69VOUca1f_moJoP989vTUZWu9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi folks! See the following bug report. Let me know if anything is
unclear -- in all honesty, I neglectfully `git worktree remove
--force`'d the first one I wrote...
Thank you for filling out a Git bug report!
Please answer the following questions to help us understand your issue.
What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue)
~$ git clone --bare https://github.com/git/git.git
---clip---
~/gitbare$ git config --list --show-origin
file:config core.repositoryformatversion=1
file:config core.filemode=false
file:config core.bare=true
file:config core.ignorecase=true
file:config remote.origin.url=https://github.com/git/git.git
~/gitbare$ git worktree add --no-checkout ../next
Preparing worktree (checking out 'next')
~/gitbare$ git config --list --show-origin
file:config core.repositoryformatversion=1
file:config core.filemode=false
file:config core.bare=true
file:config core.ignorecase=true
file:config remote.origin.url=https://github.com/git/git.git
~/gitbare$ cd ../next/
~/next$ git config --list --show-origin
file:../gitbare/config core.repositoryformatversion=1
file:../gitbare/config core.filemode=false
file:../gitbare/config core.bare=true
file:../gitbare/config core.ignorecase=true
file:../gitbare/config remote.origin.url=https://github.com/git/git.git
~/next$ git rev-parse --is-bare-repository
false
~/next$ git config extensions.worktreeconfig true
~/next$ git rev-parse --is-bare-repository
true
~/next$ git config --unset extensions.worktreeconfig
~/next$ git rev-parse --is-bare-repository
false
I actually found this situation (and narrowed it to the above) by
trying to perform a sparse-checkout in the worktree. It appears
sparse-checkout by default uses a worktree-specific config (which
does make sense).
What did you expect to happen? (Expected behavior)
I expected one of the following to happen:
1. I should have been blocked from creating a worktree from a bare
repository.
2. is_bare_repository() shouldn't be fooled by this situation,
assuming it's valid.
All things being equal, I would more expect to have been blocked
from creating a worktree from a bare repository. Personally, this
bare repo + worktree setup doesn't not align with my experience so
far with how bare repos are normally used (i.e., as a convenience
for centralized remotes that will never be doing a checkout).
What happened instead? (Actual behavior)
is_bare_repository() is fooled and I'm prevented from performing
any operation that requires a worktree (like performing a sparse
checkout).
What's different between what you expected and what actually happened?
is_bare_repository() is fooled into thinking the worktree is not a
worktree / I'm able to create a worktree from a bare repo.
Anything else you want to add:
Please review the rest of the bug report below.
You can delete any lines you don't wish to share.
[System Info]
git version:
git version 2.34.1
cpu: x86_64
no commit associated with this build
sizeof-long: 8
sizeof-size_t: 8
shell-path: /bin/sh
uname: Linux 5.4.72-microsoft-standard-WSL2 #1 SMP Wed Oct 28 23:40:43
UTC 2020 x86_64
compiler info: gnuc: 9.3
libc info: glibc: 2.31
$SHELL (typically, interactive shell): /bin/bash
[Enabled Hooks]
not run from a git repository - no hooks to show
Best,
-Sean
next reply other threads:[~2021-12-18 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-18 16:46 Sean Allred [this message]
2021-12-18 17:47 ` Bug report - Can create worktrees from bare repo / such worktrees can fool is_bare_repository() rsbecker
2021-12-18 19:00 ` Sean Allred
2021-12-18 21:55 ` rsbecker
2021-12-19 20:16 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-19 20:46 ` Sean Allred
2021-12-19 21:32 ` rsbecker
2021-12-19 22:23 ` Sean Allred
2021-12-19 22:51 ` rsbecker
2021-12-19 23:30 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-19 23:45 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-19 23:54 ` rsbecker
2021-12-20 0:07 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-20 0:58 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-20 14:11 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-12-20 15:58 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-20 17:29 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-12-20 21:58 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-20 16:20 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABceR4bZmtC4rCwgxZ1BBYZP69VOUca1f_moJoP989vTUZWu9Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=allred.sean@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).