From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] nd/clone-detached Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:48:25 +0700 Message-ID: References: <1326189427-20800-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <1326439322-15648-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <7vvcofxtv8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 14 05:49:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RlvYV-0007h3-39 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:49:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754574Ab2ANEs6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:48:58 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:33767 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751860Ab2ANEs5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:48:57 -0500 Received: by bkuw12 with SMTP id w12so447935bku.19 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:48:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=K4DR+y29t7TIoZFqo6I8LrEw6irmvY1ViKXBS97EX5M=; b=iO1IPfbqpvA8qIL3CF22Nb1Je6vuvC8UzMyHAT/nH6LHuQmyp5J58pijI03+TX+xAI WDCqKnIZDlBcEKlabDOUYoalCQcuAW/lrsgdbW5i+/hOUEWwgfkIHrS9CBUGBsNRFMnU rMJNzJ3NztNwOKEkOe8vh7OpBjOnEsn3XS6RU= Received: by 10.204.154.200 with SMTP id p8mr1487623bkw.4.1326516536168; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:48:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.66.77 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:48:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7vvcofxtv8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 2012/1/14 Junio C Hamano : > Thanks, replaced (and updated comment strings read much better). > > There were some conlicts I had to resolve while merging this to 'pu'. > I would appreciate it if you can eyeball it to make sure I didn't make > silly mistakes there. Right, the conflict with nd/clone-single-branch. I kept thinking there would not be conflict because clone-single-branch's big change was in wanted_peer_refs() and missed write_followtags() call. The merge looks good. -- Duy