From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEF11F424 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 19:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758277AbeD0TNa (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:13:30 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:43965 "EHLO mail-io0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758203AbeD0TN3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:13:29 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id t23-v6so3634313ioc.10 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:13:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=atlassian-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hv1rZoxHttav+lykWXIsKem3yveR0wpFIFk4zb4pgAY=; b=AsAf7h9AxtMNQhDEJUQp5VVai63MTY9ciP4PaGVcnZ+m7JiQ4dqD5vewvhOAdRcjvf NDPNdSNLCykp2FjIWyY1gWPis9ceKqVjJxP21+5LCW2aoNQf8nTM2ogl+DAlKIpI9Izt 4iDiul7C7T2MMnJBJ5tqoqWhWwAXoL0QPhu6VHB8I2TebxB5bJ1X1BsR0LdxnThlTpEC 6yhGYV+VPr/grWGOXeSNtCHWL5Do7O/mqW43G7VVqVyATi05HffxHvius37mZkzDPVOB xWYGWig0+Kfx/laUPjRRpgpqUgerDtoAL/4/ZcJjxavADaISNlZl/p9gJXSevvABIqin Y6/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hv1rZoxHttav+lykWXIsKem3yveR0wpFIFk4zb4pgAY=; b=fG+eB18Q7aQJXv7dK+wsB2b9gm+JvjRElKabe3UJ4jVsaYV73/CDgIDaSGB2bQ+Fiz i40cuSJ6dA8LL8acWDrTWIKW195saO7eI3UyntAS0CBuBl8hKHd2fHdZ5zrLKu95DBUr pwEv3J3df75hFG2IoifkRXVutsaU1HTZgYSbODLm09ezNcl33jRNYoaxd0Rd/S2E+Di9 otRGQaRY+28j89DzCRMRKWQx9gekodXmilGEwuOEkqEHJNcmDMyW7x7eqOTnpqGRjLTo eXuC7N/+GudsQDHtSaqMVSYhYgDhAEib1NUrbwR7KbUV09UPn4VZEdjbbxHEhMkjxAHm qFPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tB6czjEQxDtGiNadC85k8CgCyMFxzBIi/KZ/kZV3wcj4139IYO1 Tv4hMJ6CY+nKsGBbNqOMAgnyw346RqIn0+ZU//KuZw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq0zTef8I7O8jXj3wir26wtumt1Kf8IY+A34/g3EnrzaL6TikgVVqYKdrZ/XIkJPswNyqr6LQxfBCclX2upZuM= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:27d5:: with SMTP id n204-v6mr3572920ion.206.1524856408684; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.97.20 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Bryan Turner Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:13:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fetching tags overwrites existing tags To: Wink Saville Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Wink Saville wrote: > > The other change was rather than using ""+refs/tags/*:refs/remote-tags/$name/*" > I've changed it to "+refs/tags/*:refs/remote/tags/$name/*" which seems cleaner. > Again, if remote-tags is preferred I'll change it back. >From looking at the code, it looks like you mean "+refs/tags/*:refs/remotes/tags/$name/*". The issue with that approach is that it collides with a remote named "tags". "refs/remote-tags", on the other hand, represents a new-to-Git path, one that won't already be in use by any other standard functionality. That seems like a better approach than hoping no one out there will call one of their remotes "tags". Bryan