From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Schuberth Subject: Re: What is missing from Git v2.0 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:19:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <53557071.5040500@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Felipe Contreras , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 22 09:19:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WcUza-0005Gy-0g for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:19:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751856AbaDVHTm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 03:19:42 -0400 Received: from mail-yh0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:42716 "EHLO mail-yh0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756AbaDVHTk (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 03:19:40 -0400 Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f10so4459705yha.38 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:19:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MyqXP2B3S/k1oudsjcPTBvp2a3V3o6NRy15AVGBZQ60=; b=Eb57rwb0mGhl4GCqrreeamZ0iDH3LsD1aC6Skg99YOLTzCcRKbtIAOMaIfC3k7kFYe U+ZY548of5fxiVT+dKcyB112OsNWDifkMKpS8GBQQYeFbcSIY4Xr/gzwuXf3juygHfqH IVhSXHvPjQJ2aS9afK64SmYss/lf16h+Pa+RWFz6tuKKi1nsMN8huNYfowV4p85tDHLH ID64LDCZF5jT+I++V8CBwSKFzIOKMmN0Hm2htVPy+V8ZJniHr9kpiEIkOfbVouRv3Wyw Eq+eG8HfXsgiRsgcaak0X1uuAz9Bl7o4kR2/X9h5fI44sLH/M7TmJiRUzAhOKHNeOR6h WjAQ== X-Received: by 10.236.41.165 with SMTP id h25mr628312yhb.126.1398151180334; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.151.10 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:19:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> If we don't standardize this now people will come up with their own >> definitions [1] [2] (and many others if you just search GitHub) which >> are again likely to differ (slightly), hindering interoperability. > > I am afraid that that ship has sailed long time ago, though. That's most likely true, but it does not get better by postponing this even more. I still think there's value in introducing this now, Git still attracts new developers every day. In fact, I currently see a leap forwarding in the Windows world towards Git, caused by some rethinking and structural changes in some big companies. -- Sebastian Schuberth