From: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
To: git@jeffhostetler.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, jeffhost@microsoft.com,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:25:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMfpvhLevPWundgHHuMUE+x019iVjpcfR-GgtTPvkHwpuXpH3w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d751d56b-84bb-a03d-5f2a-7dbaf8d947cc@jeffhostetler.com>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:13 AM Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/13/2018 2:14 PM, Matthew DeVore wrote:
> > Teach list-objects the "tree:0" filter which allows for filtering
> > out all tree and blob objects (unless other objects are explicitly
> > specified by the user). The purpose of this patch is to allow smaller
> > partial clones.
> >
> > The name of this filter - tree:0 - does not explicitly specify that
> > it also filters out all blobs, but this should not cause much confusion
> > because blobs are not at all useful without the trees that refer to
> > them.
> >
> > I also consider only:commits as a name, but this is inaccurate because
> > it suggests that annotated tags are omitted, but actually they are
> > included.
> >
> > The name "tree:0" allows later filtering based on depth, i.e. "tree:1"
> > would filter out all but the root tree and blobs. In order to avoid
> > confusion between 0 and capital O, the documentation was worded in a
> > somewhat round-about way that also hints at this future improvement to
> > the feature.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/rev-list-options.txt | 3 ++
> > list-objects-filter-options.c | 4 +++
> > list-objects-filter-options.h | 1 +
> > list-objects-filter.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > t/t5317-pack-objects-filter-objects.sh | 27 ++++++++++++++
> > t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 27 ++++++++++++++
> > t/t6112-rev-list-filters-objects.sh | 13 +++++++
> > 7 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> > index 7b273635d..9e351ec2a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> > @@ -743,6 +743,9 @@ specification contained in <path>.
> > A debug option to help with future "partial clone" development.
> > This option specifies how missing objects are handled.
> > +
> > +The form '--filter=tree:<depth>' omits all blobs and trees deeper than
> > +<depth> from the root tree. Currently, only <depth>=0 is supported.
> > ++
> > The form '--missing=error' requests that rev-list stop with an error if
> > a missing object is encountered. This is the default action.
> > +
> > diff --git a/list-objects-filter-options.c b/list-objects-filter-options.c
> > index c0e2bd6a0..a28382940 100644
> > --- a/list-objects-filter-options.c
> > +++ b/list-objects-filter-options.c
> > @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ static int gently_parse_list_objects_filter(
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > + } else if (!strcmp(arg, "tree:0")) {
> > + filter_options->choice = LOFC_TREE_NONE;
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > } else if (skip_prefix(arg, "sparse:oid=", &v0)) {
> > struct object_context oc;
> > struct object_id sparse_oid;
> > diff --git a/list-objects-filter-options.h b/list-objects-filter-options.h
> > index 0000a61f8..af64e5c66 100644
> > --- a/list-objects-filter-options.h
> > +++ b/list-objects-filter-options.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ enum list_objects_filter_choice {
> > LOFC_DISABLED = 0,
> > LOFC_BLOB_NONE,
> > LOFC_BLOB_LIMIT,
> > + LOFC_TREE_NONE,
> > LOFC_SPARSE_OID,
> > LOFC_SPARSE_PATH,
> > LOFC__COUNT /* must be last */
> > diff --git a/list-objects-filter.c b/list-objects-filter.c
> > index a0ba78b20..8e3caf5bf 100644
> > --- a/list-objects-filter.c
> > +++ b/list-objects-filter.c
> > @@ -80,6 +80,55 @@ static void *filter_blobs_none__init(
> > return d;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * A filter for list-objects to omit ALL trees and blobs from the traversal.
> > + * Can OPTIONALLY collect a list of the omitted OIDs.
> > + */
> > +struct filter_trees_none_data {
> > + struct oidset *omits;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static enum list_objects_filter_result filter_trees_none(
> > + enum list_objects_filter_situation filter_situation,
> > + struct object *obj,
> > + const char *pathname,
> > + const char *filename,
> > + void *filter_data_)
> > +{
> > + struct filter_trees_none_data *filter_data = filter_data_;
> > +
> > + switch (filter_situation) {
> > + default:
> > + die("unknown filter_situation");
> > + return LOFR_ZERO;
> > +
> > + case LOFS_BEGIN_TREE:
> > + case LOFS_BLOB:
> > + if (filter_data->omits)
> > + oidset_insert(filter_data->omits, &obj->oid);
> > + return LOFR_MARK_SEEN; /* but not LOFR_DO_SHOW (hard omit) */
> > +
> > + case LOFS_END_TREE:
> > + assert(obj->type == OBJ_TREE);
> > + return LOFR_ZERO;
> > +
> > + }
> > +}
>
> There are a couple of options here:
> [] If really want to omit all trees and blobs (and we DO NOT want
> the oidset of everything omitted), then we might be able to
> shortcut the traversal and speed things up.
>
> {} add a LOFR_SKIP_TREE bit to list_objects_filter_result
> {} test this bit process_tree() and avoid the init_tree_desc() and
> the while loop and some adjacent setup/tear-down code.
> {} make this filter something like:
>
> case LOFS_BEGIN_TREE:
> if (filter_data->omits) {
> oidset_insert(filter_data->omits, &obj->oid);
> return LOFR_MARK_SEEN; /* ... (hard omit) */
> } else
> return LOFR_SKIP_TREE;
> case LOFS_BLOB:
> if (filter_data->omits) {
> oidset_insert(filter_data->omits, &obj->oid);
> return LOFR_MARK_SEEN; /* ... (hard omit) */
> else
> assert(...should not happen...);
I like this - it will considerably reduce the amount of work the
server needs to do on a partial clone. I'd prefer to do this in a
follow-up patchset, so I added a NEEDSWORK in the commit that adds
proper handling for filtered tree objects. I want to make sure the
unit tests are thorough when I apply your suggestion, and this
patchset is already a bit more complex than I was expecting.
>
> [] Later, if we choose to actually support a depth>0, we'll probably
> want a different filter function to conditionally include/exclude
> blobs, include shallow tree[node]s, and do some of the provisional-
> omit logic on deep tree[nodes] (in case a tree appears at multiple
> places/depths in the history). But that can wait.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> > +
> > +static void* filter_trees_none__init(
> > + struct oidset *omitted,
> > + struct list_objects_filter_options *filter_options,
> > + filter_object_fn *filter_fn,
> > + filter_free_fn *filter_free_fn)
> > +{
> > + struct filter_trees_none_data *d = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*d));
> > + d->omits = omitted;
> > +
> > + *filter_fn = filter_trees_none;
> > + *filter_free_fn = free;
> > + return d;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * A filter for list-objects to omit large blobs.
> > * And to OPTIONALLY collect a list of the omitted OIDs.
> > @@ -374,6 +423,7 @@ static filter_init_fn s_filters[] = {
> > NULL,
> > filter_blobs_none__init,
> > filter_blobs_limit__init,
> > + filter_trees_none__init,
> > filter_sparse_oid__init,
> > filter_sparse_path__init,
> > };
> > diff --git a/t/t5317-pack-objects-filter-objects.sh b/t/t5317-pack-objects-filter-objects.sh
> > index 5e35f33bf..65f2cf446 100755
> > --- a/t/t5317-pack-objects-filter-objects.sh
> > +++ b/t/t5317-pack-objects-filter-objects.sh
> > @@ -72,6 +72,33 @@ test_expect_success 'get an error for missing tree object' '
> > grep -q "bad tree object" bad_tree
> > '
> >
> > +test_expect_success 'setup for tests of tree:0' '
> > + mkdir r1/subtree &&
> > + echo "This is a file in a subtree" > r1/subtree/file &&
> > + git -C r1 add subtree/file &&
> > + git -C r1 commit -m subtree
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success 'verify tree:0 packfile has no blobs or trees' '
> > + git -C r1 pack-objects --rev --stdout --filter=tree:0 >commitsonly.pack <<-EOF &&
> > + HEAD
> > + EOF
> > + git -C r1 index-pack ../commitsonly.pack &&
> > + git -C r1 verify-pack -v ../commitsonly.pack >objs &&
> > + ! grep -E "tree|blob" objs
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success 'grab tree directly when using tree:0' '
> > + # We should get the tree specified directly but not its blobs or subtrees.
> > + git -C r1 pack-objects --rev --stdout --filter=tree:0 >commitsonly.pack <<-EOF &&
> > + HEAD:
> > + EOF
> > + git -C r1 index-pack ../commitsonly.pack &&
> > + git -C r1 verify-pack -v ../commitsonly.pack >objs &&
> > + grep -E "tree|blob" objs >trees_and_blobs &&
> > + test_line_count = 1 trees_and_blobs
> > +'
> > +
> > # Test blob:limit=<n>[kmg] filter.
> > # We boundary test around the size parameter. The filter is strictly less than
> > # the value, so size 500 and 1000 should have the same results, but 1001 should
> > diff --git a/t/t5616-partial-clone.sh b/t/t5616-partial-clone.sh
> > index bbbe7537d..fc4d182c0 100755
> > --- a/t/t5616-partial-clone.sh
> > +++ b/t/t5616-partial-clone.sh
> > @@ -170,6 +170,33 @@ test_expect_success 'partial clone fetches blobs pointed to by refs even if norm
> > git -C dst fsck
> > '
> >
> > +test_expect_success 'can use tree:0 to filter partial clone' '
> > + rm -rf dst &&
> > + git clone --no-checkout --filter=tree:0 "file://$(pwd)/srv.bare" dst &&
> > + git -C dst rev-list master --missing=allow-any --objects >fetched_objects &&
> > + cat fetched_objects \
> > + | awk -f print_1.awk \
> > + | xargs -n1 git -C dst cat-file -t >fetched_types &&
> > + sort fetched_types -u >unique_types.observed &&
> > + echo commit > unique_types.expected &&
> > + test_cmp unique_types.observed unique_types.expected
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success 'show missing tree objects with --missing=print' '
> > + git -C dst rev-list master --missing=print --quiet --objects >missing_objs &&
> > + sed "s/?//" missing_objs \
> > + | xargs -n1 git -C srv.bare cat-file -t \
> > + >missing_types &&
> > + sort -u missing_types >missing_types.uniq &&
> > + echo tree >expected &&
> > + test_cmp missing_types.uniq expected
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success 'do not complain when a missing tree cannot be parsed' '
> > + git -C dst rev-list master --missing=print --quiet --objects 2>rev_list_err >&2 &&
> > + ! grep -q "Could not read " rev_list_err
> > +'
> > +
> > . "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-httpd.sh
> > start_httpd
> >
> > diff --git a/t/t6112-rev-list-filters-objects.sh b/t/t6112-rev-list-filters-objects.sh
> > index 0a37dd5f9..6ccffddbc 100755
> > --- a/t/t6112-rev-list-filters-objects.sh
> > +++ b/t/t6112-rev-list-filters-objects.sh
> > @@ -196,6 +196,19 @@ test_expect_success 'verify sparse:oid=oid-ish omits top-level files' '
> > test_cmp observed expected
> > '
> >
> > +# Test tree:0 filter.
> > +
> > +test_expect_success 'verify tree:0 includes trees in "filtered" output' '
> > + git -C r3 rev-list HEAD --quiet --objects --filter-print-omitted --filter=tree:0 \
> > + | awk -f print_1.awk \
> > + | sed s/~// \
> > + | xargs -n1 git -C r3 cat-file -t \
> > + | sort -u >filtered_types &&
> > + printf "blob\ntree\n" > expected &&
> > + test_cmp filtered_types expected
> > +'
> > +
> > +
> > # Delete some loose objects and use rev-list, but WITHOUT any filtering.
> > # This models previously omitted objects that we did not receive.
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-14 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 151+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-09 22:44 [RFC PATCH 0/5] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] revision: invert meaning of the USER_GIVEN flag Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 18:43 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] list-objects-filter: implement filter only:commits Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 0:14 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 0:24 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-10 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Jonathan Tan
2018-08-10 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 " Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:20 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 0:22 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 16:03 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-10 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:none Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 16:38 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-08-14 0:57 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:29 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 0:55 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 15:13 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-08-14 17:25 ` Matthew DeVore [this message]
2018-10-03 19:00 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 18:06 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 22:43 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 22:56 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 23:14 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 18:18 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 20:00 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 20:19 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-14 23:30 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 16:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-15 16:37 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 20:01 ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 23:55 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 1:22 ` Jeff King
2018-08-15 16:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-15 17:54 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-08-17 21:42 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-17 22:19 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-17 22:28 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-20 23:30 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-21 0:29 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-21 21:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-22 18:00 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-18 16:17 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-20 13:04 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-20 18:38 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-20 23:20 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-21 0:36 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-21 15:50 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 20:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-05 18:00 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 20:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 20:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-06 0:08 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:41 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Stefan Beller
2018-09-14 0:55 ` [PATCH v8 " Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 0:55 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 0:55 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 0:55 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 0:55 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 0:55 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-14 20:08 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 0:55 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 0:55 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-14 17:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-15 0:41 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:31 ` [PATCH v9 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:31 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:31 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 23:08 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 " Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 1/8] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 2/8] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 4/8] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 5/8] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 6/8] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 7/8] list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 8/8] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-10-07 0:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-08 17:23 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 1/8] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 2/8] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 4/8] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 5/8] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 6/8] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 7/8] list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 8/8] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-10-15 2:37 ` [PATCH v12 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Junio C Hamano
2018-10-15 3:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-16 15:00 ` Matthew DeVore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMfpvhLevPWundgHHuMUE+x019iVjpcfR-GgtTPvkHwpuXpH3w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=matvore@google.com \
--cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=stefanbeller@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).