Re: [PATCH 1/1] diff-lib: use worktree mode in diffs from i-t-a entries

["Martin Ågren" <martin.agren@gmail.com>]

On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 at 13:24, Raymond E. Pasco <ray@ameretat.dev> wrote:
>
> On Sat Aug 8, 2020 at 4:48 AM EDT, Martin Ågren wrote:
> > Describing the current state of affairs and using imperative mode, it
> > could be something like:
> >
> > When creating "new file" diffs against i-t-a index entries, diff-lib
> > erroneously uses the mode of the cache entry rather than the mode of
> > the file in the worktree. Change run_diff_files() to correctly use the
> > mode of the worktree file in this case.
>
> I see both styles around in the tree (past for the state of the world
> before this patch, present for the state of the world as of this patch,
> vs. present for the state of the world just before and just after
> applying this patch). Neither is unreadable to me so I just want to do
> whatever's the standard around here.

Yeah, there are all kinds of log messages in the history.
SubmittingPatches (search for "imperative") recommends this way of
writing.

> (I'm not convinced, as a matter of grammar, that the
> commit-message-present verb form is really in the imperative mood; I
> think the freeform nature of English grammar obscures that it's the
> present active infinitive, analogous to, say, the fact that a French
> software program with an "open file" button will say "ouvrir" and not
> "ouvrez".)

When you put it that way, I'm also not sure. :-)

> The whole set of i-t-a diffing behaviors needs a test suite (unless I've
> grepped very poorly), which will come in another patchset. t4140 in this
> thread's main patchset assumes they work.

I did grep a little when I wrote my previous reply and I didn't find
anything either.

I guess you could add a very small testcase here and then base that
future series on top of this commit. Or in lieu of a test, maybe this
could be used:

  Tested-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>

Martin