From: 胡哲宁 <adlternative@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ls-files.c: add --deduplicate option
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:50:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOLTT8Qp2NMpbk56U6PVEmFVyZYWN6gM83HD4z_nmPWV4Z_ruw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1reec943.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 于2021年1月22日周五 上午4:45写道:
>
> 胡哲宁 <adlternative@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> OK. When show_stage is set, skipping_duplicates is automatically
> >> turned off (and show_unmerged is automatically covered as it turns
> >> show_stage on automatically). So this feature has really become
> >> "are we showing only names, and if so, did we show an entry of the
> >> same name before?".
> > Yeah,showing only names,so I yesterday ask such question :)
> >>
> >> > if (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce))
> >> > show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf,
> >> > ce_stage(ce) ? tag_unmerged :
> >> > (ce_skip_worktree(ce) ? tag_skip_worktree :
> >> > tag_cached));
> >> > + if (show_cached && skipping_duplicates)
> >> > + last_shown_ce = ce;
> >>
> >> The code that calls show_ce() belonging to a totally separate if()
> >> statement makes my stomach hurt---how are we going to guarantee that
> >> "last shown" really will keep track of what was shown last?
> >>
> >> Shouldn't the above be more like this?
> >>
> >> - if (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce))
> >> + if (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce)) {
> >> show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf,
> >> ce_stage(ce) ? tag_unmerged :
> >> (ce_skip_worktree(ce) ? tag_skip_worktree :
> >> tag_cached));
> >> + last_shown_ce = ce;
> >> + }
> >>
> > well,I am also thinking about this question :"last_shown_ce" is not true
> > last shown ce,but may be If "last_shown_ce" truly seen every last shown
> > ce ,We may need more cumbersome logic to make the program correct.
> > I have tried the processing method of your above code before, but found
> > that some errors may have occurred.
>
> I think judicious use of "goto" without introducing the last_shown
> would probably result in a much more maintainable code. It may look
> somewhat like so:
>
> for (i = 0; i < repo->index->cache_nr; i++) {
> const struct cache_entry *ce = repo->index->cache[i];
> struct stat st;
> int stat_err;
>
> construct_fullname(&fullname, repo, ce);
>
> if ((dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_IGNORED) &&
> !ce_excluded(dir, repo->index, fullname.buf, ce))
> continue;
> if (ce->ce_flags & CE_UPDATE)
> continue;
> if ((show_cached || show_stage) &&
> (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce))) {
> show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf,
> ce_stage(ce) ? tag_unmerged :
> (ce_skip_worktree(ce) ? tag_skip_worktree :
> tag_cached));
> if (skip_duplicates)
> goto skip_to_next_name;
> }
>
> if (!show_deleted && !show_modified)
> continue;
> if (ce_skip_worktree(ce))
> continue;
> stat_err = lstat(fullname.buf, &st);
> if (stat_err && (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR))
> error_errno("cannot lstat '%s'", fullname.buf);
>
> if (show_deleted) {
> show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_removed);
> if (skip_duplicates)
> goto skip_to_next_name;
> }
> if (show_modified &&
> (stat_err || ie_modified(repo->index, ce, &st, 0)))
> show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_modified);
> continue;
>
> skip_to_next_name:
> {
> int j;
> const struct cache_entry **cache = repo->index->cache;
> for (j = i + 1; j < repo->index->cache_nr; j++)
> if (strcmp(ce->ce_name, cache[j]->ce_name))
> break;
> i = j - 1; /* compensate for outer for loop */
> }
> }
I have to admit that this is indeed a good way to skip with "goto".
Thanks for your help.
And should I still use gitgitgadget PR on my origin branch "dedup"or
send patch on branch "zh/ls-files-deduplicate"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 8:53 [PATCH] builtin/ls-files.c:add git ls-file --dedup option 阿德烈 via GitGitGadget
2021-01-07 6:10 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-07 6:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " 阿德烈 via GitGitGadget
2021-01-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] builtin:ls-files.c:add " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-14 6:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-14 8:17 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-14 12:22 ` [PATCH v3] ls-files.c: add " 阿德烈 via GitGitGadget
2021-01-15 0:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-17 3:45 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-17 4:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-16 7:13 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-17 3:49 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-17 5:11 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-17 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-18 14:59 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-17 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] builtin/ls-files.c:add git ls-file " 阿德烈 via GitGitGadget
2021-01-17 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ls_files.c: bugfix for --deleted and --modified ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-17 6:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-17 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ls_files.c: consolidate two for loops into one ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-17 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ls-files: add --deduplicate option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-17 6:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-17 23:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-18 4:09 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-18 6:05 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-18 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-19 2:56 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-19 6:30 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] builtin/ls-files.c:add git ls-file --dedup option 阿德烈 via GitGitGadget
2021-01-19 6:30 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ls_files.c: bugfix for --deleted and --modified ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-20 20:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-21 10:02 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-19 6:30 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ls_files.c: consolidate two for loops into one ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-20 20:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-21 11:05 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-19 6:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ls-files.c: add --deduplicate option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-20 21:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-21 11:00 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-21 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 9:50 ` 胡哲宁 [this message]
2021-01-22 16:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-22 18:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-19 13:54 ` GitGitGadget and `next`, was " Johannes Schindelin
2021-03-19 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-23 8:20 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-22 15:46 ` [PATCH v6] " ZheNing Hu
2021-01-22 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-23 8:27 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-23 10:20 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] builtin/ls-files.c:add git ls-file --dedup option 阿德烈 via GitGitGadget
2021-01-23 10:20 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ls_files.c: bugfix for --deleted and --modified ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-23 17:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-23 10:20 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] ls_files.c: consolidate two for loops into one ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-23 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-23 10:20 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] ls-files.c: add --deduplicate option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-23 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-23 19:53 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] ls_files.c: bugfix for --deleted and --modified Junio C Hamano
2021-01-23 19:53 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] ls_files.c: consolidate two for loops into one Junio C Hamano
2021-01-23 19:53 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] ls-files.c: add --deduplicate option Junio C Hamano
2021-01-24 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] builtin/ls-files.c:add git ls-file --dedup option 阿德烈 via GitGitGadget
2021-01-24 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] ls_files.c: bugfix for --deleted and --modified ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-24 22:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-25 6:05 ` 胡哲宁
2021-01-25 19:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-24 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] ls_files.c: consolidate two for loops into one ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-01-24 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] ls-files.c: add --deduplicate option ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOLTT8Qp2NMpbk56U6PVEmFVyZYWN6gM83HD4z_nmPWV4Z_ruw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=adlternative@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).