From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
"Hariom verma" <hariom18599@gmail.com>,
"Shourya Shukla" <periperidip@gmail.com>,
"Оля Тележная" <olyatelezhnaya@gmail.com>,
"Jiang Xin" <worldhello.net@gmail.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GSoC Git Proposal Draft - ZheNing Hu
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:34:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOLTT8SW0n=x3HBL=php0aC1nhP7eU-MHFLustC3H0opxGRV1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLTT8RTA0inxgxbd3qDToKYxwgXGKvJikXWsXg7oQ4asFj+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Peff,
> Why is Olga’s solution rejected?
> 1. Olga's solution is to let `git cat-file` use the `ref-filter` interface,
> the performance of `cat-file` appears to be degraded due "very eager to
> allocate lots of separate strings" in `ref-filter` and other reasons.
I am thinking today whether we can directly append some object information
directly to `&state->stack->output`, Instead of assigning to `v->s` firstly.
But in `cmp_ref_sorting()` we will use `get_ref_atom_value()`, It is possible
to compare `v->s` of two different refs, I must goto fill object info in `v->s`.
So I think this is one of the reasons why `ref-filter` desires to
allocate a large
number of strings, right?
--
ZheNing Hu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-11 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-02 9:03 GSoC Git Proposal Draft - ZheNing Hu ZheNing Hu
2021-04-02 14:57 ` Christian Couder
2021-04-03 13:23 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-04-02 15:39 ` Jeff King
2021-04-03 14:27 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-04-07 19:28 ` Jeff King
2021-04-08 13:29 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-04-11 6:11 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-04-11 15:34 ` ZheNing Hu [this message]
2021-04-13 6:40 ` Jeff King
2021-04-13 14:51 ` ZheNing Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOLTT8SW0n=x3HBL=php0aC1nhP7eU-MHFLustC3H0opxGRV1w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=adlternative@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hariom18599@gmail.com \
--cc=olyatelezhnaya@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=periperidip@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=worldhello.net@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).