From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GSOC] cat-file: fix --batch report changed-type bug
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 20:46:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOLTT8SZxiBtxj7=B-75gVghZAp-qf_oqFGwyi7iKD61uH-vsw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLWSRBJHiph+Bejo@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> 于2021年6月1日周二 上午9:49写道:
>
> Or we could just generate the entire expected output and check it with
> "cmp". The most robust way is probably to loop over the objects, running
> "git cat-file" for each, but that's slow. Maybe:
>
> git cat-file --batch-all-objects --batch-check='%(objectname)' >objects &&
> git cat-file --batch='%(objectname)' <objects >expect &&
> git cat-file --batch-all-objects --batch='%(objectname)' >actual &&
> # not test_cmp, as it is not binary clean!
> cmp expect actual
>
> That feels a bit circular in that it's mostly just exercising most of
> the same code in the "expect" and "actual" paths. The interesting part
> is the combination of the two options, which is why I think that just
> making sure we don't hit an error might be enough.
>
Such a test is also acceptable. I will add a test like this.
> -Peff
--
ZheNing Hu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-01 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-30 8:29 [PATCH] [GSOC] cat-file: fix --batch report changed-type bug ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-30 21:09 ` Jeff King
2021-05-31 13:20 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-31 14:44 ` Jeff King
2021-05-31 15:32 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-31 16:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-01 1:49 ` Jeff King
2021-06-01 6:34 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-01 15:34 ` Jeff King
2021-06-01 16:42 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-01 12:46 ` ZheNing Hu [this message]
2021-05-30 21:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-30 21:36 ` Jeff King
2021-06-01 1:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-31 13:55 ` ZheNing Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOLTT8SZxiBtxj7=B-75gVghZAp-qf_oqFGwyi7iKD61uH-vsw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=adlternative@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hariom18599@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).