From: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz> To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Partial Clone, and a strange slow rev-list call on fetch Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 06:56:25 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAPMMpogCz4o3ZGYHnux_6w+uFyxV-FR0R1hFNeg1COiv0qd_0g@mail.gmail.com> (raw) Hi folks, I'm learning to use Partial Clone, and finding a behavior that I don't know how to interpret or investigate: Under some circumstances, doing a plain "git fetch <remote>" on a filtered repo results in a very long (6-30 min?) wait, during which I can see the following command being executed in the background: /usr/libexec/git-core/git rev-list --objects --stdin --exclude-promisor-objects --not --all --quiet --alternate-refs So far, I have noted this happening under two distinct circumstances: * Anytime I try to fetch on a filtered repo with a git 2.23 client - shorter pause * When I try to fetch with a recent (2.31) client in a repo where one large packfile has no *.promisor file (but the others do, and the remote I am fetching from has promisor=true) - looong pause Can anyone explain what this rev-list call intends, and/or any hints as to how I could see what the stdin content being fed to it from the parent process actually is? For background, I ended up in the "missing promisor file" situation by trying to be (too?) clever about the blobs present in my clone: I cloned unfiltered shallow to a certain depth with certain refspecs, then added the promisor and filter config, and finally fetched with "--unshallow". This produced exactly the blob-population state I intended, but meant the original first packfile had no ".promisor" file. Creating an empty promisor file for that packfile *appears* to fix the issue, and hasn't produced any weird side-effects that I've noted, and from the "removing partial clone filtering" description from gitlab at https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/topics/git/partial_clone.html#remove-partial-clone-filtering, appears to be a reasonable thing to do (the implication there is that a promisor packfile with no missing objects hs exactly the same structure as a non-promisor packfile), but of course I would welcome any validation or correction to that assumption. Thanks for any info, Tao Klerks
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 4:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-02 4:56 Tao Klerks [this message] 2021-06-02 11:18 ` Derrick Stolee 2021-06-03 21:10 ` Tao Klerks 2021-06-04 13:21 ` Derrick Stolee 2021-06-05 6:35 ` Tao Klerks
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAPMMpogCz4o3ZGYHnux_6w+uFyxV-FR0R1hFNeg1COiv0qd_0g@mail.gmail.com \ --to=tao@klerks.biz \ --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='Re: Partial Clone, and a strange slow rev-list call on fetch' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).