git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2018, #02; Mon, 6)
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 02:30:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRGVaJqP7XFzb9RQDqr543auoawMUmkynXar-paTeL9BQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cRoxiPUhXFA2vdZWh0iLfitFeN5CbUDduJuRZ0JGw=fvA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:47 PM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:36 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> > * pw/rebase-i-author-script-fix (2018-08-02) 2 commits
> >  - sequencer: fix quoting in write_author_script
> >  - sequencer: handle errors in read_author_ident()
> >  (this branch uses es/rebase-i-author-script-fix.)
> >
> >  Undecided.
> >  Is it the list consensus to favor this "with extra code, read the
> >  script written by bad writer" approach?
>
> Phillip's original "effectively one-liner" backward compatibility[1]
> seemed a reasonable compromise[2] between the choices of no backward
> compatibility and heavyweight backward compatibility of his
> re-roll[3]. His reference[4] to an earlier "one-liner" backward
> compatibility solution given similar circumstances bolstered the case
> for his original approach.

To summarize, I think Phillip is planning to re-roll, going with the
simpler backward-compatibility (though he was waiting an "okay" from
you[2]).

[2]: https://public-inbox.org/git/455fafb5-3c92-4348-0c2c-0a4ab62cf2ce@talktalk.net/

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-07  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-06 22:35 What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2018, #02; Mon, 6) Junio C Hamano
2018-08-07  3:47 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-08-07  6:30   ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2018-08-07  6:21 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-07 14:36   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-07 14:54   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-08 22:41     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPig+cRGVaJqP7XFzb9RQDqr543auoawMUmkynXar-paTeL9BQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).