From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] chainlint: improve annotated output
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:52:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cTLoyyzU3+qo8UA7iGCh9o9UbowOz_Z_debN3NXoN8=_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cSWXYhp95kcRn1EHrPW15o_z7uL+TcHO-hf6owP5FQnNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 5:43 PM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 5:29 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08 2022, Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > > (Note to self: Add Ævar to nerd-snipe blacklist alongside Peff.)
> >
> > Also, and I guess this is an attempt to evade your blacklist. I *did*
> > notice when playing around with this that if I now expand the "1 while"
> > loop here:
> > [...]
> > To something that "follows along" with the parser it shouldn't be too
> > hard in the future to add line number annotations now. E.g. for
> > "#!/bin/sh\n" you'll emit a token like "\n", but the positions will be
> > 0, 10.
> >
> > But that's all for some hypothetical future, this is already much better
>
> My nerd-snipe blacklist hasn't fully solidified yet, unfortunately (for me).
I forgot to add that if you do manage to penetrate my nerd-snipe
blacklist, such a feature would be built atop the current series (i.e.
no reason to hold up this series for the "hypothetical future", as you
say).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 19:08 [PATCH 0/4] chainlint: improve annotated output Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-11-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] chainlint: add explanatory comments Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-11-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] chainlint: tighten accuracy when consuming input stream Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-11-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] chainlint: latch start/end position of each token Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-11-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] chainlint: annotate original test definition rather than token stream Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-11-08 20:28 ` [PATCH 0/4] chainlint: improve annotated output Taylor Blau
2022-11-09 13:11 ` Jeff King
2022-11-10 2:42 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-08 22:17 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-08 22:43 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-11-08 22:52 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPig+cTLoyyzU3+qo8UA7iGCh9o9UbowOz_Z_debN3NXoN8=_w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).