From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89B51F62D for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 05:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932191AbeGFFSb (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 01:18:31 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.161.194]:37563 "EHLO mail-yw0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932115AbeGFFSa (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 01:18:30 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f194.google.com with SMTP id w76-v6so3769986ywg.4 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 22:18:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/IYDETTFabgPN73WlkKMkDgMdxR+C8h8d7TKBS60S/8=; b=iuL7W5FoJBiJMO3B6dYr4AQXjKGCYh6i3Daejt43m9zhVrtmL976f6HpUt1s/HzY+f ivwB6y3iMVmD26kQtjkaHhKRx3neQV9lMQ+7b0OtHP+wT1FOfbHj61EXRlsAdGd2mYtd Ts7+mdQGLjpu+2Hm2JsKjRLXc1KhrDf/H3YidmPhTIw228ly2v29g0mVjlFlaqJ0Yivh 9iLB15e3PsOH0zZsAYFuUjWfdnEkWoNbDi0hlh/kxAu/8KjI0SMsH4N4CDlwbmU2BD2o BOtMXLXQusdPn+olG7SvZOYNK6s/24TFnGvZ91oxnwsyYENdvbZgNrrvEJnD5gEH7P8z ronA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1NaVAQ/wma1oFa5dWq7A34K26Qr1sZPASBWd9YyTgI9hIqk7NV tZF9HGpmmKLrs6R76vKmjQOcKSzZVa3bB6Ym2BU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpclvr0gy4LA3UDDU2NWmE+4suE/V8magFgp12DOhlsuV7JQ9J8RUg/UJ7GdqjYbOY+BUJ0N8H7cD1RNd4alzCo= X-Received: by 2002:a81:4153:: with SMTP id f19-v6mr4340503ywk.418.1530854310360; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 22:18:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180625143434.89044-1-dstolee@microsoft.com> <20180706005321.124643-1-dstolee@microsoft.com> <20180706005321.124643-7-dstolee@microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: From: Eric Sunshine Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 01:18:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/24] multi-pack-index: load into memory To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Git List , Junio C Hamano , Stefan Beller , =?UTF-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41jIER1eQ==?= , =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Derrick Stolee Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:19 AM Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:53 PM Derrick Stolee wrote: > > +midx_read_expect () { > > + cat >expect <<-EOF > > + header: 4d494458 1 0 0 > > + object_dir: . > > + EOF > > + test-tool read-midx . >actual && > > + test_cmp expect actual > > +} > > + > > test_expect_success 'write midx with no packs' ' > > git multi-pack-index --object-dir=. write && > > - test_path_is_file pack/multi-pack-index > > + test_path_is_file pack/multi-pack-index && > > + midx_read_expect > > Kind of a do-nothing change. I wonder if this step would better be > delayed until a later patch. (Not necessarily a big deal.) Never mind. I missed that midx_read_expect() is comparing the 'expect' and 'actual' files, so this is not a do-nothing change. The function name may have helped to mislead me (or I was just unobservant or too focused on its creation of the 'expect' file). I wonder if a different name would have helped. midx_check(), midx_verify()? Meh.