git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>,
	"Curtin, Eric" <Eric.Curtin@dell.com>,
	Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@yandex.ru>,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Geary, Niall" <Niall.Geary@dell.com>,
	"rowlands, scott" <Scott.Rowlands@dell.com>,
	Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
	"Coveney, Stephen" <Stephen.Coveney@dell.com>
Subject: Re: Collaborative conflict resolution feature request
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:56:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPx1Gvf5R6b1NoUWHkaqLMaj6dr51hERVvuVe1X9k3NEafnBhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPx1GvdT6sZRtu8q1R9=fA-mE9pi1Ag-gKEzQfwbGap+KqSoSg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:32 AM Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've thought about this (some) myself in the past.  It seems to me that what
> is needed is the ability to pass the complete unmerged state on.

A few further thoughts:

 * Given one or more saved merges and either a clean state or an
   ongoing merge, we need a tool to combine these.  There are a lot of
   corner cases here but in general, if merge X has file F in conflict and
   merge Y has file F resolved, we can take the resolution from Y.

 * Partial merges (in the work-tree copy of a file) that are not yet added
   may be the trickiest.  A simple heuristic would be to look for the
   conflict markers and see if one work-tree copy has a resolution
   where another work-tree copy has a conflict.  Or, though this is
   harder, use the ours/theirs copies in the saved index trees to find
   actual conflicted regions and compare this to the work-tree copy
   to find resolved regions.

 * There is also an obvious question about what to do when combining
   two different proposed resolutions where the stage-zero and/or
   work-tree copies of the files don't match.

None of these preclude the basic ability to save and restore—and of
course transport, through fetch/push—the unmerged state, which I think
is the required enabling technology.  The ideas above are more for
combining parallel merge efforts.  If it's acceptable for dev A to merge
his/her part and pass the result to dev B, who merges theirs, and so
on, the above is not required.

Chris

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-16 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-12 14:08 Collaborative conflict resolution feature request Curtin, Eric
2020-06-13 11:33 ` Johannes Sixt
2020-06-13 12:08 ` Christian Couder
2020-06-13 12:38   ` Curtin, Eric
2020-06-13 13:14     ` Philip Oakley
2020-06-13 16:44       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-06-15  9:51       ` Sergey Organov
2020-06-15 11:04         ` Philip Oakley
2020-06-16 17:17           ` Stefan Moch
2020-06-17 18:32             ` Curtin, Eric
2020-06-17 21:17               ` Sergey Organov
2020-06-13 17:10     ` Christian Couder
2020-06-13 19:22       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-06-13 19:34         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-06-14 11:05           ` Philip Oakley
2020-06-14 13:00         ` Konstantin Tokarev
2020-06-15  9:28           ` Curtin, Eric
2020-06-15 11:31             ` Philip Oakley
2020-06-15 16:57               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-06-15 17:32                 ` Chris Torek
2020-06-16 15:56                   ` Chris Torek [this message]
2020-06-15 19:37                 ` Philip Oakley
2020-06-17 18:30                   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-06-18  8:11             ` demerphq
2020-06-18  8:53               ` Curtin, Eric
2020-06-18  9:28                 ` Curtin, Eric
2020-06-18 10:14                   ` demerphq
2020-06-19  9:17                     ` Curtin, Eric
2020-06-20 16:09                       ` Christian Couder
2020-06-21  0:20                         ` Curtin, Eric
2020-06-16  9:08   ` Christian Couder
2020-06-15 12:55 ` Sergey Organov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPx1Gvf5R6b1NoUWHkaqLMaj6dr51hERVvuVe1X9k3NEafnBhg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=chris.torek@gmail.com \
    --cc=Eric.Curtin@dell.com \
    --cc=Niall.Geary@dell.com \
    --cc=Scott.Rowlands@dell.com \
    --cc=Stephen.Coveney@dell.com \
    --cc=annulen@yandex.ru \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=philipoakley@iee.email \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).