From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C806C433ED for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F4C611ED for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236720AbhDCOIx (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Apr 2021 10:08:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40248 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236380AbhDCOIw (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Apr 2021 10:08:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275A5C0613E6 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 07:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id il9-20020a17090b1649b0290114bcb0d6c2so5830839pjb.0 for ; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 07:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :cc:to; bh=xCoBc+j1m6Hs+3UG/4uX4i9TaxW0SNygGt9LA+eAoNI=; b=rGZCdCP8lJPb0etU9MAHtKaKcmookTx1UylNVELNXvcl5Psv89dthrCmCKLyv5/4Kz NRE6SFxBuxtd8/mFrrEbzxANK2Eb1b5e5/ckC7yomwmRhNoM84bH6knwwWolCLqz+Fpr ZYGU2cGPiaYDru0VHEZkoMRC2POwotWsRdhO5dTD0VRV+LItNY/5fwr9TQbILGVuwdKk GnPMpCTUAjZNsISYdSdmsS9CEYY2Roce4LZL+1TDMuHnVdcWw03BDPDLFY1LpM9HV71o if1NbaCMP6r3f3Z9PAS0z1BzpAl2F3/tam6z8r7Ndc1DSEW3+dqrpcj720AHYfxw2X0e 5NNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=xCoBc+j1m6Hs+3UG/4uX4i9TaxW0SNygGt9LA+eAoNI=; b=hK3K/gvDXaPrK+5d0F+XwVU1LVh7e/3/f7j5w6guKzMUcOV9zgC4aJHP/aCkrg6Hts Y/yrwpdVCxacFPmAbOCrp6WIazG8XDc/5kglyZ2+s8Wy2dPRcEWCujHwzrMM28gOCRPF QsXs35ruI4TZxbvC7dBjvW6ZecB6Cd1+L4mvS6BL8eLqcNI790L3lSo7361lpwstxCUu z+PDo08lOWhiHO43alrDwyKoQNh7huabIPJ1NMDICIr+PGVnjsAv7PuWfr5D7tzxyF/k Hl4fI66RnsJGhY2u6EkegvpDoO30GOjBr73aTsP0AKW3zNoL1+LrZdIxRHSC0zM5NBmX YU4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5311aOgkg+7S2Yq1Aw5pbzNTZoa4d0zPdsXIkuxS9ZVMpeYnXx+I 9SLftTFwTcrH5asIjk6zrA5/BM33+8Lq2w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2xXDWFBQeCpdQCIGnIgYjbKhjKid18DDts1Tdf0sToLutWSl2PbELUU+R5kqTJZ6nsXpqKA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:fe07:b029:e6:6cba:d95a with SMTP id g7-20020a170902fe07b02900e66cbad95amr16908728plj.70.1617458928123; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atharva-on-air.dlink ([119.82.121.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w7sm6602786pff.208.2021.04.03.07.08.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Apr 2021 07:08:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Atharva Raykar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Subject: [GSoC][Draft Proposal] Finish converting git submodule to builtin Message-Id: Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 19:38:43 +0530 Cc: christian.couder@gmail.com, shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com, periperidip@gmail.com To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Below is my draft of my GSoC proposal. I have noticed that Chinmoy has = already submitted a proposal for the same idea before me, so would that be = considered "taken"? (I don't think I can submit another proposal for the other idea = either, because someone has already sent one for that as well) Since I have already put my effort into this for a while, I thought I = might as well send it, but I'll accept whatever the mentors say about the = eligibility of this proposal. Here is a prettier markdown version: https://gist.github.com/tfidfwastaken/0c6ca9ef2a452f110a416351541e0f19 = --8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<= -- ___________________ GSOC GIT PROPOSAL Atharva Raykar ___________________ Table of Contents _________________ 1. Personal Details 2. Background 3. Me and Git .. 1. Current knowledge of git 4. The Project: Finish converting `git submodule' to builtin 5. Prior work 6. General implementation strategy 7. Timeline (using the format dd/mm) 8. Beyond GSoC 9. Blogging 10. Final Remarks: A little more about me 1 Personal Details =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Name : Atharva Raykar Major : Computer Science and Engineering Email : raykar.ath@gmail.com IRC nick : atharvaraykar on #git and #git-devel Address : RB 103, Purva Riviera, Marathahalli, Bangalore Postal Code : 560037 Time Zone : IST (UTC+5:30) GitHub : http://github.com/tfidfwastaken 2 Background =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I am Atharva Raykar, currently in my third year of studying Computer Science and Engineering at PES University, Bangalore. I have always enjoyed programming since a young age, but my deep appreciation for good program design and creating the right abstractions came during my exploration of the various rabbitholes of knowledge originating from communities around the internet. I have personally enjoyed learning about Functional Programming, Database Architecture and Operating Systems, and my interests keep expanding as I explore more in this field. I owe my appreciation of this rich field to these communities, and I always wanted to give back. With that goal, I restarted the [PES Open Source] community in our campus, with the goal of creating spaces where members could share knowledge, much in the same spirit as the communities that kickstarted my journey in Computer Science. I learnt a lot about collaborating in the open, maintainership, and reviewing code. While I have made many small contributions to projects in the past, I am hoping GSoC will help me make the leap to a larger and more substantial contribution to one of my favourite projects that made it all possible in my journey with Open Source. [PES Open Source] 3 Me and Git =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Here are the various forms of contributions that I have made to Git: - [Microproject] userdiff: userdiff: add support for Scheme Status: In progress, patch v2 pending List: = - [Git Education] Conducted a workshop with attendance of hundreds of students new to git, and increased the prevalence of of git's usage in my campus. Photos: and I intend to continue helping people out on the mailing list and IRC and tending to patches wherever possible in the meantime. 3.1 Current knowledge of git ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I use git almost daily in some form, and I am fairly comfortable with it. I have already read and understood the chapters from the Git Book about submodules along with the one on objects, references, packfiles and the refspec. 4 The Project: Finish converting `git submodule' to builtin =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Git has historically had many components implemented in the form of shell scripts. This was less than ideal for several reasons: - Portability: Non-POSIX systems like Windows don't play nice with shell script commands like grep, cd and printf, to name a few, and these commands have to be reimplemented for the system. There are also POSIX to Windows path conversion issues. - No direct access to plumbing: Shell commands do not have direct access to the low level git API, and a separate shell is spawned to just to carry out their operations. - Performance: Shell scripts tend to create a lot of child processes which slows down the functioning of these commands, especially with large repositories. Over the years, many GSoC students have converted the shell versions of these commands to C. Git `submodule' is the last of these to be converted. 5 Prior work =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I will be taking advantage of the knowledge that was gained in the process of the converting the previous scripts and avoiding all the gotchas that may be present in the process. There may be a bunch of useful helper functions in the previous patches that can be reused as well (more investigation needed to determine what exactly is reusable). Currently the only other commands left to be completed for `submodule' are `add' and `update'. Work for `add' has already been started by a previous GSoCer, Shourya Shukla, and needs to picked up from there. Reference: = I'll have these as my references when I am working on the project: His blog about his progress: (more has been implemented since) Shourya's latest patch for `submodule add': = For the most part, the implementation looks fairly complete, but there seems to be a segfault occurring, along with a few changes suggested by the reviewers. It will be helpful to contact Shourya to fully understand what needs to be done. Prathamesh's previous conversion work: = 6 General implementation strategy =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The way to port the shell to C code for `submodule' will largely remain the same. There already exists the builtin `submodule--helper.c' which contains most of the previous commands' ports. All that the shell script for `git-submodule.sh' is doing for the previously completed ports is parsing the flags and then calling the helper, which does all the business logic. So I will be moving out all the business logic that the shell script is performing to `submodule--helper.c'. Any reusable functionality that is introduced during the port will be added to `submodule.c' in the top level. For example: The general strategy for converting `cmd_update()' would be to have a call to `submodule--helper' in the shell script to a function which would resemble something like `module_update()' which would perform the work being done by the shell script past the flags being parsed and make the necessary calls to `update_clone()', and the git interface in C for performing the merging, checkout and rebase where necessary. After this process, the builtin is added to the commands array in `submodule--helper.c'. And since these two functions are the last bit of functionality left to convert in submodules, an extended goal can be to get rid of the shell script altogether, and make the helper into the actual builtin [1]. [1] = 7 Timeline (using the format dd/mm) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Periods of limited availability (read: hectic chaos): - =46rom 13/04 to 20/04 I will be having project evaluations and lab assessments for five of my courses. - =46rom 20/04 to 01/05 I have my in-semester exams. - For a period of two weeks in the range of 08/05 to 29/05 I will be having my end-semester exams. My commitment: I will still have time during my finals to help people out on the mailing list, get acquainted with the community and its processes, and even review patches if I can. This is because we get holidays between each exam, and my grades are good enough to that I can prioritise git over my studies ;-) And on the safe side, I will still engage with the community from now till 07/06 so that the community bonding period is not compromised in any way. Periods of abundant availability: After 29/05 all the way to the first week of August, I will be having my summer break, so I can dedicate myself to git full-time :-) I would have also finished all my core courses, so even after that, I will have enough of time to give back to git past my GSoC period. Phase 1: 07/06 to 14/06 -- Investigate and devise a strategy to port the submodule functions - This phase will be more diagrams in my notebook than code in my editor -- I will go through all the methods used to port the other submodule functions and see how to do the same for what is left. - I will find the C equivalents of all the shell invocations in `git-submodule.sh', and see what invocations have /no/ equivalent and need to be created as helpers in C (Eg: What is the equivalent to the `ensure-core-worktree' invocation in C?). For all the helpers and new functionality that I do introduce, I will need to create the testing strategy for the same. - I will go through all the work done by Shourya in his patch, and try to understand it properly. I will also see the mistakes that were caught in all the reviews for previous submodule conversion patches and try to learn from them before I jump to the code. - Deliverable: I will create a checklist for all the work that needs to be done with as much detail as I can with the help of inputs from my mentor and all the knowledge I have gained in the process. Phase 2: 14/06 to 28/06 -- Convert `add' to builtin in C - I will work on completing `git submodule add'. One strategy would be to either reimplement the whole thing using what was learnt in Shourya's attempt, but it is probably wiser to just take his patch and modify it. I would know what to do by the time I reach this phase. - I will also add tests for this functionality. I will also document my changes when required. These would be unit tests for the helpers introduced, and integration of `add' with the other commands. - Deliverable: Completely port `add' to C! Phase 3: 28/06 to 16/08 -- Convert `update' to builtin - Some work has already been done by Stephan Beller that moves the functionality of `update' to `submodule--helper.c': = , but a lot of the business logic of going into the submodule and checking out or merging or rebasing needs to still be converted. Plenty to do here. - As with `add', all of the appropriate tests need to be written and the changes documented. As I have learnt from the Pro Git Book, there are a lot of subtleties with how update does its work that I need to watch out for. - Deliverable: Completely port `update' to C! Bonus Phase: If I am ahead of time -- Remove the need for a `submodule--helper', and make it a proper C builtin. - Once all the submodule functionality is ported, the shell script is not really doing much more than parsing the arguments and passing it to the helper. We won't need this anymore if it is implemented. 8 Beyond GSoC =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I love the process of working as a community more than anything else, and I already felt very welcomed by the git community the moment I started sending in my microproject patch series. Whether I am selected or not, I will continue giving back to git wherever I can. Since my final year is light on coursework, I will be able to mentor people and help expand the git developer community through all the ways I can (be it code review, helping people find the right resources or evangelism of git). 9 Blogging =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I will be blogging about my progress on a weekly basis and either post it on my website at (probably will tuck it away in a /gsoc path). Technical blogging is not particularly new to me, and I hope my posts can help future contributors of git. 10 Final Remarks: A little more about me =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D These are some of my core values that I believe will be important to pull off this project and make the most of my time in GSoC: - Hard problems don't frustrate me, rather they excite me. Bugs make my brain perk up (this sentence best left with context). I love learning. - I am pro-transparency. If I am having some trouble, I will be open about it. I don't hesitate to ask questions and dig deep if I need to. - At the same time, when I ask a question, I only do so after I have struggled with the problem for enough time and done my due diligence in trying to solve it. Clear communication is very important to make this work. - I am also very comfortable with learning things all on my own (I have barely known any other way), and working in a remote, asynchronous setting. I hope to make the world better in my own small way by contributing to a tool that everyone uses and I like. It's more rewarding than any internship that my peers are doing this year. I look forward to learning more.