From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adapt tutorial to cygwin and add test case Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:08:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <7vu0fnsu6f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 12 13:10:25 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EPeTl-00074Q-4E for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:09:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751401AbVJLLI5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:08:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751437AbVJLLI5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:08:57 -0400 Received: from wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de ([132.187.3.28]:29420 "EHLO wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751401AbVJLLI4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:08:56 -0400 Received: from wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.1.30]) by wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6482913EC57; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:08:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from virusscan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495579ECA6; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:08:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.28]) by wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E319EC7E; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:08:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dumbo2 (wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.25.13]) by wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C7513EC57; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:08:55 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: gene099@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vu0fnsu6f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (Rechenzentrum Universitaet Wuerzburg) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The original was both ugly and did not use boxquote. There is > no excuse for ugliness, but not using boxquote was for a > reason. I am no expert in non-ugliness, and neither in asciidoc. My first version of the patch removed the single "+" on a line, because I thought they were remnants of a corrupted patch... By using git-whatchanged I found out that this is not so, and finally I found that it means "continuation" in asciidoc syntax. So: Sorry, can't help here. Ciao, Dscho