From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: What's in git.git Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:17:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <7v1wxg82r3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46a038f90603060105m29595745ke64d4a623506c0b0@mail.gmail.com> <20060310104443.GA4491@c165.ib.student.liu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Martin Langhoff , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 10 12:18:22 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHfdF-0003J4-0R for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:18:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750961AbWCJLSA (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:18:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750774AbWCJLSA (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:18:00 -0500 Received: from wrzx35.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de ([132.187.3.35]:28365 "EHLO mailrelay.uni-wuerzburg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752230AbWCJLR7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:17:59 -0500 Received: from virusscan.mail (mail04.mail [172.25.1.103]) by mailrelay.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id A015612D9; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:17:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virusscan.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A565EFE; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:17:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from dumbo2 (wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.25.13]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4944CA81; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:17:58 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: gene099@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de To: Fredrik Kuivinen In-Reply-To: <20060310104443.GA4491@c165.ib.student.liu.se> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-wuerzburg.de Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Fredrik Kuivinen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:05:41PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > On 3/6/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > - The deathmatch between annotate/blame (Ryan Anderson, Fredrik > > > Kuivinen, me cheerleading) > > > > Add fuel to the fire ;-) Can git-blame take cached git-rev-list > > output like annotate does with -S? > > > > Currently it cannot do that. How is that option used? The history is linearized, and the commits are ordered accordingly, then to be passed to git-annotate/-blame. > If you want to make annotate/blame faster for certain files you might as > well cache the output of annotate/blame instead of the git-rev-list > output, no? > > What am I missing? Two things: - the history is growing, and - it would be inefficient/error-prone to save the annotates for files Hth, Dscho