From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:44:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <7vodly0xn7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v647tcjr6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vejmdq63w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v647ninbq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <81b0412b0704231007i81ee20cx9a37f1c8a3df62b1@mail.gmail.com> <7vvefnf1wb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070423211658.GA21404@steel.home> <7v4pn6ep41.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <81b0412b0704240858w6121430fj624582539f14ceee@mail.gmail.com> <81b0412b0704240914o1096476dn7f26210be987e3fd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 24 18:44:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgO8B-0008Ti-B7 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:44:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754250AbXDXQol (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:44:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754240AbXDXQok (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:44:40 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:52481 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754145AbXDXQok (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:44:40 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2007 16:44:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 18:44:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19zf7FYgklzE5o9UJbzc9YdlTPLSCZrukof0trVtc DdgqftRYN1ORe+ X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <81b0412b0704240914o1096476dn7f26210be987e3fd@mail.gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Alex Riesen wrote: > On 4/24/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > > which will be a PITA to setup in each and every clone of the > > > repository, unless it is cloned with the repo. > > > > Not if you do it with templates. If it is such a special case that you > > absolutely _need_ filters, and cannot use it without filters, it is > > probably in a very small group. And there, you just setup the > > templates, and voila: you have your filters without much ado. > > It can be a very big group. Than, even if it is the only group in the > world, it can complain loud and long enough to become a major annoyance. Yes, they can. And if we can prove that it would have been cleaner and better and more stable to do the same without attributes, they will look like a big group of total morons. Ciao, Dscho