From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:20:51 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <7v646wqrvm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vfy5wcnbg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vd50xz7lq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vodkb1adr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7virac547s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v6466oygl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 03 02:23:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Huds4-0000M0-6B for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 02:23:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754420AbXFCAWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:22:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762774AbXFCAWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:22:52 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:52739 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754420AbXFCAWv (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:22:51 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jun 2007 00:22:49 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO localhost) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp057) with SMTP; 03 Jun 2007 02:22:49 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+FQEVZTHqFuF5Zje2hU7Q82l028+rN4qDTL00vh+ tPK6kZR29AwPpv X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7v6466oygl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * lh/submodules (Sat Jun 2 03:27:42 2007 +0200) 2 commits > + Add basic test-script for git-submodule > + Add git-submodule command > > I find this a 'master' material already. Will merge soon. I agree. Even if I had not time to review it closely, from a cursory look it is clean enough. I don't expect any regressions from that. > * pb/am (Thu May 24 19:25:25 2007 -0700) 2 commits > + Remove git-applypatch > + git-applymbox: Remove command > > Will push out to 'master' soon to see if anybody screams. Ack. > * jc/diff (Mon Dec 25 01:08:50 2006 -0800) 2 commits > - test-para: combined diff between HEAD, index and working tree. > - para-walk: walk n trees, index and working tree in parallel > > Backburnered. I actually like those two commits, and I always wanted to work on top of these, but my new boss keeps me away from Git :-( Will review, and try to work some more on them in the next three weeks. Don't drop them! As for the complicated source code: I cannot agree. If you have _any_ idea about what data structures are about, you will readily recognize what it is about. We _could_ be more explicit, but by a huge margin. (IMHO too many people try to chime in without _any_ clue about the difference of hash tables and binary search, and no notion of Landau's symbol. We should not necessarily try to accomodate people who are _that_ unwilling to work up their theory.) Ciao, Dscho