git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Jacob Vosmaer <jacob@gitlab.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] builtin/pack-objects.c: avoid iterating all refs
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:26:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YAdqkYtxqeXVnzN3@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119143348.27535-1-jacob@gitlab.com>

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:33:47PM +0100, Jacob Vosmaer wrote:

> What I learned is that by default, a fetch ends up using the
> '--include-tag' command line option of git-pack-objects. This causes
> git-pack-objects to iterate through all the tags of the repository to
> see if any should be included in the pack because they point to packed
> objects. The problem is that this "iterate through all the tags" uses
> for_each_ref which iterates through all references in the repository,
> and in doing so loads each associated object into memory to check if
> the ref is broken. But all we need for '--include-tag' is to iterate
> through refs/tags/.
> 
> On the repo we were testing this on, there are about
> 500,000 refs but only 2,000 tags. So we had to load a lot of objects
> just for the sake of '--include-tag'. It was common to see more than
> half the CPU time in git-pack-objects being spent in do_for_each_ref,
> and that in turn was dominated by ref_resolves_to_object.

Some of these details may be useful in the commit message, too. :)

Your "load a lot of objects" had me worried for a moment. We try hard
not to load objects during such an iteration, even when peeling them
(because the packed-refs format has a magic shortcut there). But I think
that is all working as intended. What you were seeing was just tons of
has_object_file() to make sure the ref was not corrupt (so finding the
entry in a packfile, but not actually inflating the object contents).

Arguably both upload-pack and pack-objects could use the INCLUDE_BROKEN
flag to avoid even checking this. We'd notice the problem when somebody
actually tried to fetch the object in question. That would speed things
up further on top of your patch, because we wouldn't need to check the
existence of even the tags. But it's definitely orthogonal, and should
be considered separately.

-Peff

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 14:33 [PATCH 0/1] builtin/pack-objects.c: avoid iterating all refs Jacob Vosmaer
2021-01-19 14:33 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jacob Vosmaer
2021-01-19 23:08   ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 23:33     ` Jeff King
2021-01-19 23:54       ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 23:15   ` Jeff King
2021-01-20  8:50   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-01-20 15:02     ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-20 16:32       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-01-20 19:53     ` Jeff King
2021-01-21 10:26       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-01-21 15:34         ` Jeff King
2021-01-19 23:26 ` Jeff King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YAdqkYtxqeXVnzN3@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jacob@gitlab.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).