git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, me@ttaylorr.com, peff@peff.net,
	gitster@pobox.com, abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com,
	Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>,
	Taylor Blau <ttaylorr@github.com>,
	Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>,
	Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] commit-graph: always parse before commit_graph_data_at()
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:08:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBn3fxFe978Up5Ly@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <454b183b9ba502da7f40dc36aaa95cc3d12b5c2f.1612234883.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

Derrick Stolee wrote:

> There is a subtle failure happening when computing corrected commit
> dates with --split enabled. It requires a base layer needing the
> generation_data_overflow chunk. Then, the next layer on top
> erroneously thinks it needs an overflow chunk due to a bug leading
> to recalculating all reachable generation numbers. The output of
> the failure is
>
>   BUG: commit-graph.c:1912: expected to write 8 bytes to
>   chunk 47444f56, but wrote 0 instead

At Google, we're running into a commit-graph issue that appears to
have also arrived as part of this last week's rollout.  This one is a
bit worse --- it is reproducible for affected users and stops them
from being able to do day-to-day development:

  $ git pull
  remote: Finding sources: 100% (33/33)
  remote: Total 33 (delta 18), reused 33 (delta 18)
  Unpacking objects: 100% (33/33), 27.44 KiB | 460.00 KiB/s, done.
  From https://example.com/path/to/repo
     05ba0d775..279e4e6d0  master     -> origin/master
  BUG: commit-reach.c:64: bad generation skip     29e3 >      628 at 62abdabd1be00ebadbf73061ecf72b35042338e3
  error: merge died of signal 6

"git commit-graph verify" agrees that the generation numbers are wrong:

  $ git commit-graph verify
  commit-graph generation for commit 4290b2214cdf50263118322735347d151715a272 is 3 != 1586
  Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (1/1), done.
  commit-graph generation for commit b6c73a8472c7cb503cce0668849150a4b4329230 is 1576 != 10724
  Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (10/10), done.
  Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (88/88), done.
  Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (208/208), done.
  Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (592/592), done.
  Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (1567/1567), done.
  Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (8358/8358), done.

We have some examples of repositories that were corrupted this way,
but we didn't catch them in the act of corruption --- it started
happening to several users with this release so we immediately rolled
back.

Questions:

- is this likely to be due to the same cause, or is it orthogonal?

- what is the recommended way to recover from this state?  "git fsck"
  shows the repositories to have no problems.  "git help commit-graph"
  doesn't show a command for users to use; is
  `rm -fr .git/objects/info/commit-graphs/` the recommended recovery
  command?

- is there configuration or a patch we can roll out to help affected
  users recover from this state?

Thanks,
Jonathan

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-03  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01 17:15 [PATCH 0/5] Generation Number v2: Fix a tricky split graph bug Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] commit-graph: use repo_parse_commit Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 17:32   ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-01 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] commit-graph: always parse before commit_graph_data_at() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 18:44   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 17:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] commit-graph: validate layers for generation data Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 17:39   ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-01 18:10     ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-01 17:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] commit-graph: be extra careful about mixed generations Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 18:04   ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-01 18:13     ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-01 18:55   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 17:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] commit-graph: prepare commit graph Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 18:25   ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-02  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Generation Number v2: Fix a tricky split graph bug Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-02  3:01   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] commit-graph: use repo_parse_commit Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-02  3:01   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] commit-graph: always parse before commit_graph_data_at() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-03  1:08     ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2021-02-03  1:35       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-03  1:48         ` Jonathan Nieder
2021-02-03  3:07           ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-03 15:34             ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-03 17:37               ` Eric Sunshine
2021-02-03 18:41               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-03 21:08                 ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-03  2:06         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-03  3:09           ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-07 19:04           ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-02-07 20:12             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-08  2:01               ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-08  5:55                 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-02  3:01   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] commit-graph: validate layers for generation data Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-02  3:01   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] commit-graph: compute generations separately Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-02  3:01   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] commit-graph: be extra careful about mixed generations Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-02  3:01   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] commit-graph: prepare commit graph Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-02  3:08   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Generation Number v2: Fix a tricky split graph bug Taylor Blau
2021-02-11  4:44   ` Abhishek Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YBn3fxFe978Up5Ly@google.com \
    --to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    --cc=ttaylorr@github.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).