From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>,
Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t1092: use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY for consistent results
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 20:13:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKxBIP4lkoPeCYvb@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fsybohy5.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:57:52AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Mon, May 24 2021, Taylor Blau wrote:
>
> > But I don't think this isolated instance should push in the direction of
> > adding support for either of the above, regardless of how easy it might
> > be.
>
> I don't see why we wouldn't just tweak GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY to support -1
> or something for "inf".
Ironically, I think that this already works, since we parse the value of
GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY as unsigned, and don't bother checking for if the
input is negative (since we eventually call git_parse_unsigned(), which
doesn't have any extra checks other than for overflow).
So we silently convert -1 to 2^64-1, and call it a day.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 19:55 [PATCH] t1092: use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY for consistent results Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-05-24 20:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2021-05-24 20:38 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-24 21:42 ` Taylor Blau
2021-05-24 22:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-25 0:13 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2021-05-25 0:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-25 6:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-25 10:54 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-25 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-25 21:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-25 21:49 ` Taylor Blau
2021-05-25 2:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-25 15:10 ` Taylor Blau
2021-05-25 7:39 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-25 8:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-25 2:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-25 2:41 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKxBIP4lkoPeCYvb@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).