From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
"Chris Torek" <chris.torek@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] connected: do not sort input revisions
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:00:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQzQGVQdh4t0uZ3N@ncase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqfsvnloju.fsf@gitster.g>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1961 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 11:44:05AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> > revs->unsorted_input = 0;
> > - else if (!strcmp(optarg, "unsorted"))
> > + } else if (!strcmp(optarg, "unsorted"))
> > revs->unsorted_input = 1;
>
> This is --no-walk=unsorted; could it have been given after --no-walk
> or --no-walk=unsorted?
>
> The application of the incompatibility rules seems a bit uneven. An
> earlier piece of code will reject "--no-walk=unsorted --no-walk" given
> in this order (see "And likewise" above). But here, this part of
> the code will happily take "--no-walk --no-walk=unsorted".
>
> Of course these details can be fixed with more careful code design,
> but I wonder if it may be result in the code and behaviour that is
> far simpler to explain (and probably implement) if we declare that
>
> * --no-walk is not a synonym to --no-walk=sorted; it just flips
> .no_walk member on.
>
> * --no-walk=sorted and --no-walk=unsorted flip .no_walk member on,
> and then flips .unsorted_input member off or on, respectively.
>
> and define that the usual last-one-wins rule would apply?
>
> Thanks.
Wouldn't that effectively change semantics though? If the user passes
`git rev-list --no-walk=unsorted --no-walk`, then the result is a sorted
revwalk right now. One may argue that most likely, nobody is doing that,
but you never really know.
An easier approach which keeps existing semantics is to just make
`--no-walk` and `--unsorted-input` mutually exclusive:
- If the `unsorted_input` bit is set and `no_walk` isn't, and we
observe any `--no-walk` option, then we bail.
- Likewise, if the `no_walk` bit is set, then we bail when we see
`--unsorted-input` regardless of the value of `unsorted_input`.
This would keep current semantics of `--no-walk`, but prohobit
using it together with the new option.
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-28 5:33 [PATCH v2 0/3] Speed up connectivity checks via bitmaps Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28 5:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] p5400: add perf tests for git-receive-pack(1) Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28 7:49 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-29 6:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-29 12:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-28 5:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] receive-pack: skip connectivity checks on delete-only commands Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28 8:00 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-28 8:06 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-29 6:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-30 1:31 ` Jeff King
2021-06-30 1:35 ` Jeff King
2021-06-30 13:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28 5:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] connected: implement connectivity check using bitmaps Patrick Steinhardt
2021-06-28 20:23 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-29 22:44 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-30 2:04 ` Jeff King
2021-06-30 3:07 ` Taylor Blau
2021-06-30 5:45 ` Jeff King
2021-07-02 17:44 ` Taylor Blau
2021-07-02 21:21 ` Jeff King
2021-06-30 1:51 ` Jeff King
2021-07-20 14:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Speed up connectivity checks Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] connected: do not sort input revisions Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 12:49 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-03 8:50 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-04 11:01 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-02 19:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-03 8:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-03 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] revision: stop retrieving reference twice Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 12:53 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] revision: avoid loading object headers multiple times Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 12:55 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-05 10:12 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 19:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-03 9:07 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-06 14:17 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] revision: avoid hitting packfiles when commits are in commit-graph Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-02 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-03 9:16 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-03 21:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-05 11:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 16:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-04 10:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-08-05 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Speed up connectivity checks Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] revision: separate walk and unsorted flags Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 18:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-05 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] connected: do not sort input revisions Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-06 6:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2021-08-06 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-08-05 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] revision: stop retrieving reference twice Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] revision: avoid loading object headers multiple times Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] commit-graph: split out function to search commit position Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-05 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] revision: avoid hitting packfiles when commits are in commit-graph Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09 8:00 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Speed up connectivity checks Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09 8:02 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09 8:11 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] revision: separate walk and unsorted flags Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] connected: do not sort input revisions Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] revision: stop retrieving reference twice Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] commit-graph: split out function to search commit position Patrick Steinhardt
2021-08-09 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] revision: avoid hitting packfiles when commits are in commit-graph Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQzQGVQdh4t0uZ3N@ncase \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=chris.torek@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).