From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: "Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón" <carenas@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] builtin/add: remove obsoleted support for legacy stash -p
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:33:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YS146dlPrxwF0dl6@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210817064435.97625-2-carenas@gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:44:34PM -0700, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote:
> 90a6bb98d1 (legacy stash -p: respect the add.interactive.usebuiltin
> setting, 2019-12-21) adds a hidden option and its supporting code
> to support the legacy stash script, but that was left behind when
> it was retired.
>
> mostly revert commit.
(Sorry for a much-delayed response, I'm trying to do a little bit of
inbox-cleaning ;)).
If you're re-rolling based on Dscho's suggestions later on in the
series, I'd suggest two changes to make the patch message clearer:
- Clarify the antecedent of "it" in "it was retired". I find that
"...but that [option] was forgotten about even when [the legacy
stash implementation] was retired".
- Link to the commit where we dropped support for that implementation
(which was in 8a2cd3f512 (stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin
setting, 2020-03-03)) to make it clear that that happened after
90a6bb98d1.
- Finally "mostly revert commit." should add more detail without being
verbose. I'd write:
Since 8a2cd3f512 removed the legacy implementation, the changes
from 90a6bb98d1 are no longer necessary, so revert them.
> @@ -483,6 +480,7 @@ int cmd_add(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> builtin_add_usage, PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0);
> if (patch_interactive)
> add_interactive = 1;
> +
Stray whitespace change, but the rest of the patch looks good to me.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-31 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-17 6:44 [PATCH 0/2] builtin/add: minor unrelated fixes Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
2021-08-17 6:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] builtin/add: remove obsoleted support for legacy stash -p Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
2021-08-31 0:33 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2021-08-17 6:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin/add: make clear edit and patch/interactive are incompatible Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
2021-08-17 10:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YS146dlPrxwF0dl6@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=carenas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).