git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com>
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2021, #08; Mon, 27)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:16:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVVyUkwYNfkEqNfU@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929184339.GA19712@neerajsi-x1.localdomain>

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:43:39AM -0700, Neeraj Singh wrote:

> It seems to me that one problem is that the new "primary" objdir code doesn't
> disable ref updates since the GIT_QUARANTINE_ENVIRONMENT setting isn't set.
> If we fix that we should be forbidding ref updates.
> 
> I've included a path that fixes my test case. This is on top of:
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/CANQDOddqwVtWfC4eEP3fJB4sUiszGX8bLqoEVLcMf=v+jzx19g@mail.gmail.com/

Ah, right, I forgot we had that "forbid ref updates in quarantine" magic
(despite being the one who added it).

I do think this improves the safety, but things are still a bit more
dangerous because we're handling it all in a single process, which sees
both the quarantine and non-quarantine states. I wrote more details in
this reply a few minutes ago:

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/YVVmssXlaFM6yD5W@coredump.intra.peff.net/

(sorry, it's long; search for the paragraph starting with "Whereas doing
it in-process").

> When creating a subprocess with a temporary ODB, we set the
> GIT_QUARANTINE_ENVIRONMENT env var to tell child Git processes not
> to update refs, since the tmp-objdir may go away.
> 
> Introduce a similar mechanism for in-process temporary ODBs when
> we call tmp_objdir_replace_primary_odb.
> 
> Peff's test case was invoking ref updates via the cachetextconv
> setting. That particular code silently does nothing when a ref
> update is forbidden

Oh good. I was worried that it would generate ugly errors, rather than
silently skipping the update.

> @@ -2126,7 +2146,7 @@ int ref_transaction_prepare(struct ref_transaction *transaction,
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (getenv(GIT_QUARANTINE_ENVIRONMENT)) {
> +	if (getenv(GIT_QUARANTINE_ENVIRONMENT) || !ref_updates_are_enabled()) {
>  		strbuf_addstr(err,
>  			      _("ref updates forbidden inside quarantine environment"));
>  		return -1;

I think the overall goal of this patch makes sense, but this
conditional, along with tmp-objdir reaching out to the refs code, feels
funny. Should we perhaps have a single:

  int tmp_objdir_is_primary(struct repository *r)
  {
	if (the_tmp_objdir &&
	    !strcmp(the_tmp_objdir->path.buf, r->objects->odb->path))
		return 1; /* our temporary is the primary */

	if (getenv(GIT_QUARANTINE_PATH))
		return 1; /* our caller put us in quarantine */

	return 0;
  }

Then it's all nicely abstracted and the ref code does not have to know
the details of GIT_QUARANTINE_PATH in the first place.

If you do got that route, the strcmp() might need to be a little more
careful about whether r->objects can be NULL (I didn't check).
Alternatively, I kind of wonder if "struct object_directory" should just
have a flag that says "is_temporary".

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-28  0:52 What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2021, #08; Mon, 27) Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28  1:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28 20:52   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28  6:46 ` Elijah Newren
2021-09-28  7:45   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28 17:25     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28 21:00       ` Neeraj Singh
2021-09-28 23:34         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28 23:53           ` Neeraj Singh
2021-10-07 22:01             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-10-08  6:51               ` Elijah Newren
2021-10-08 22:30                 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-10-08 23:01                 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28  8:07   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28 17:27     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28 13:31   ` Derrick Stolee
2021-09-28 17:33     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28 20:16       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-09-28 17:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-29  6:42     ` Elijah Newren
2021-09-28 23:40   ` Jeff King
2021-09-28 23:49     ` Jeff King
2021-09-29 18:43     ` Neeraj Singh
2021-09-30  8:16       ` Jeff King [this message]
2021-10-01  7:50         ` Elijah Newren
2021-10-01 17:02           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-10-01 17:39             ` Neeraj Singh
2021-10-01 18:15               ` Elijah Newren
2021-10-01 18:12             ` Elijah Newren
2021-10-01 22:02               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-10-01 23:05                 ` Elijah Newren
2021-10-04 13:45     ` Elijah Newren
2021-09-28  8:22 ` da/difftool (was: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2021, #08; Mon, 27)) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28  8:23 ` ns/batched-fsync & en/remerge-diff (was " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28  8:31 ` sg/test-split-index-fix " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28  8:35 ` hn/reftable (Re: " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28 12:18   ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2021-09-30  5:06     ` Carlo Arenas
2021-09-29  8:12 ` What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2021, #08; Mon, 27) Fabian Stelzer
2021-09-30 21:26   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVVyUkwYNfkEqNfU@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=nksingh85@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).