git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
To: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, peff@peff.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] fetch-pack: load tip_oids eagerly iff needed
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 00:11:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a82bf622-8ef8-5525-c3a8-b983d0cfe662@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181004213813.158688-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>

Am 04.10.2018 um 23:38 schrieb Jonathan Tan:
>> Determine if the oidset needs to be populated upfront and then do that
>> instead.  This duplicates a loop, but simplifies the existing one by
>> separating concerns between the two.
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> +	if (strict) {
>> +		for (i = 0; i < nr_sought; i++) {
>> +			ref = sought[i];
>> +			if (!is_unmatched_ref(ref))
>> +				continue;
>> +
>> +			add_refs_to_oidset(&tip_oids, unmatched);
>> +			add_refs_to_oidset(&tip_oids, newlist);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	/* Append unmatched requests to the list */
>>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_sought; i++) {
>>  		ref = sought[i];
>>  		if (!is_unmatched_ref(ref))
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> -		if ((allow_unadvertised_object_request &
>> -		     (ALLOW_TIP_SHA1 | ALLOW_REACHABLE_SHA1)) ||
>> -		    tip_oids_contain(&tip_oids, unmatched, newlist,
>> -				     &ref->old_oid)) {
>> +		if (!strict || oidset_contains(&tip_oids, &ref->old_oid)) {
>>  			ref->match_status = REF_MATCHED;
>>  			*newtail = copy_ref(ref);
>>  			newtail = &(*newtail)->next;
> 
> I don't think the concerns are truly separated - the first loop quoted
> needs to know that in the second loop, tip_oids is accessed only if
> there is at least one unmatched ref.

Right, the two loops are still closely related, but only the first one
is concerned with loading refs.

For a true separation we could first build a list of unmatched refs and
then loop through that instead of `sought`.  Not sure if that's better,
but maybe the overhead I imagine it would introduce isn't all that big.

> Would it be better to expose the
> size of the oidset and then use it in place of
> "tip_oids->map.map.tablesize"? Checking for initialization (using
> "tablesize") is conceptually different from checking the size, but in
> this code, both initialization and the first increase in size occur upon
> the first oidset_insert(), so we should still get the same result.

It would work in practice.  If there are no refs to load then it would
try to load those zero refs for each unmatched ref, which shouldn't
really be a problem, but I still find it a wee bit sloppy.  Too
theoretical?

René

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-04 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-03 13:11 [PATCH v2 0/2] oidset: use khash René Scharfe
2018-10-03 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] khash: factor out kh_release_* René Scharfe
2018-10-03 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] oidset: use khash René Scharfe
2018-10-03 19:40   ` Jeff King
2018-10-04  5:56     ` René Scharfe
2018-10-04  6:48       ` Jeff King
2018-10-04  6:50         ` Jeff King
2018-10-04 15:05         ` René Scharfe
2018-10-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " René Scharfe
2018-10-04 15:09   ` [PATCH v3 1/5] fetch-pack: factor out is_unmatched_ref() René Scharfe
2018-10-04 15:09   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] fetch-pack: load tip_oids eagerly iff needed René Scharfe
2018-10-04 21:38     ` Jonathan Tan
2018-10-04 22:11       ` René Scharfe [this message]
2018-10-05 20:13         ` René Scharfe
2018-10-04 22:14       ` Jeff King
2018-10-04 22:52         ` Jonathan Tan
2018-10-04 23:18           ` Jeff King
2018-10-04 22:07     ` Jeff King
2018-10-05 20:13       ` René Scharfe
2018-10-05 20:27         ` Jeff King
2018-10-05 21:22           ` René Scharfe
2018-10-05 21:47             ` Jeff King
2018-10-04 15:10   ` [PATCH v3 3/5] khash: factor out kh_release_* René Scharfe
2018-10-04 15:13   ` [PATCH v3 4/5] oidset: use khash René Scharfe
2018-10-04 15:14   ` [PATCH 5/5] oidset: uninline oidset_init() René Scharfe
2018-10-04 22:15   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] oidset: use khash Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a82bf622-8ef8-5525-c3a8-b983d0cfe662@web.de \
    --to=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] fetch-pack: load tip_oids eagerly iff needed' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox