From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D95A1F437 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750905AbdAXXdv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:33:51 -0500 Received: from zimbra-vnc.tngtech.com ([83.144.240.98]:6784 "EHLO proxy.tng.vnc.biz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750792AbdAXXdu (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:33:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proxy.tng.vnc.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472E31E3816; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:33:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxy.tng.vnc.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (proxy.tng.vnc.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 6LIG_sZUw0Or; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:33:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proxy.tng.vnc.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5EA1E3821; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:33:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at Received: from proxy.tng.vnc.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (proxy.tng.vnc.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kxIvlNmRbhKB; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:33:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.178.31] (aftr-185-17-206-134.dynamic.mnet-online.de [185.17.206.134]) by proxy.tng.vnc.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E6831E3816; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:33:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] completion: recognize more long-options To: Junio C Hamano References: <20170122225724.19360-1-cornelius.weig@tngtech.com> <20170122225724.19360-8-cornelius.weig@tngtech.com> <74ecd09c-55da-3858-5187-52c286a6bf62@kdbg.org> <967937ff-e5ff-2515-2f50-80a96683c068@tngtech.com> Cc: Johannes Sixt , bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen@googlemail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de, john@keeping.me.uk From: Cornelius Weig Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:33:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 01/25/2017 12:24 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Cornelius Weig writes: > >>> Please study item (5) "Sign your work" in >>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches and sign off your work. >> >> I followed the recommendations to submitting work, and in the first >> round signing is discouraged. > > Just this point. You found a bug in our documentation if that is > the case; it should not be giving that impression to you. > Well, I am referring to par. (4) of Documentation/SubmittingPatches (emphasis mine): <<<<<<<<<<<<<< *Do not PGP sign your patch, at least for now*. Most likely, your maintainer or other people on the list would not have your PGP key and would not bother obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not judged by who you are; a good patch from an unknown origin has a far better chance of being accepted than a patch from a known, respected origin that is done poorly or does incorrect things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If first submissions should be signed as well, then I find this quite misleading.