From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH] gc: call "prune --expire 2.weeks.ago" Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:45:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <7vskywadum.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vbq5k77z0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 12 16:46:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZT9I-0007JC-Ij for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:45:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751660AbYCLPpK (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:45:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751672AbYCLPpK (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:45:10 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:25267 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751572AbYCLPpI (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:45:08 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0JXM004LWJR72460@VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:45:07 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > The real question I asked was: is 2 weeks a sensible default? As I said, > I was almost tempted to reduce it to 3 days. 3 days would make me nervous, even if it should be plenty safe. 2 weeks is OTOH maybe a bit too conservative. What about one week instead? Nicolas