Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] revision: ensure MERGE_HEAD is a ref in prepare_show_merge

["Jean-Noël Avila" <avila.jn@gmail.com>]

Hello,

Le 25/02/2024 à 22:56, Philippe Blain a écrit :
> From: Michael Lohmann <mi.al.lohmann@gmail.com>
> 
> This is done to
> (1) ensure MERGE_HEAD is a ref,
> (2) obtain the oid without any prefixing by refs.c:repo_dwim_ref()
> (3) error out when MERGE_HEAD is a symref.
> 
> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Lohmann <mi.al.lohmann@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
> ---
>  revision.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index 2424c9bd67..ee26988cc6 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -1973,8 +1973,12 @@ static void prepare_show_merge(struct rev_info *revs)
>  	if (repo_get_oid(the_repository, "HEAD", &oid))
>  		die("--merge without HEAD?");
>  	head = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, "HEAD");
> -	if (repo_get_oid(the_repository, "MERGE_HEAD", &oid))
> +	if (read_ref_full("MERGE_HEAD",
> +			RESOLVE_REF_READING | RESOLVE_REF_NO_RECURSE,
> +			&oid, NULL))
>  		die("--merge without MERGE_HEAD?");
> +	if (is_null_oid(&oid))
> +		die(_("MERGE_HEAD is a symbolic ref?"));

Following the thread about being less passive-aggressive, maybe this
could be rephrased in an assertive mood.

By the way, this string is translatable, but not the one 2 lines above.
What is the policy around translation?

>  	other = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, "MERGE_HEAD");
>  	add_pending_object(revs, &head->object, "HEAD");
>  	add_pending_object(revs, &other->object, "MERGE_HEAD");
> 

Thanks.