From: "Raymond E. Pasco" <ray@ameretat.dev>
To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Eli Schwartz" <eschwartz93@gmail.com>,
"René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"brian m . carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
"Konstantin Ryabitsev" <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>,
demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] git archive: use gzip again by default, document output stabilty
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 19:23:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de8f1e338e6ee99cd3ee06b16f1edbce@ameretat.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <771a98ca-9540-ad4e-dfba-9d304e1dff09@dunelm.org.uk>
February 2, 2023 11:17 AM, "Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> wrote:
> Playing devil's advocate for a moment as we're not going to promise that the compressed output of
> "git archive" will be stable in the future perhaps we should use this breakage as an opportunity to
> highlight that to users and to advertize the config setting that allows them to use gzip for
> compressing archives. Reverting the change gives the misleading impression that we're making a
> commitment to keeping the output stable. The focus of this thread seems to be the problems relating
> to github which they have already addressed.
>
> I think there is general agreement that it is not practical to promise that the compressed output
> of "git archive" is stable so maybe it is better to make that clear now while users can work around
> it in the short term with a config setting rather than waiting until we're faced with some security
> or other issue that forces a change to the output which users cannot work around so easily.
Reverting to the behavior of "use some arbitrary gzip from $PATH" would
be a poor decision whether or not git were willing to make some
commitment to gzip stability, because Git does not control arbitrary
gzips on the user's $PATH. If Git did want to promise gzip stability, it
could only start from something like the current internal implementation
along with a vendored zlib; if it doesn't, as appears to be the case,
then the internal implementation is superior for the other reasons
already discussed.
If the user wants to depend on a particular gzip executable they supply,
this configuration knob already exists for them.
Since there is no guarantee of stability, but there has been a popular
misconception that there is some such guarantee (e.g., [1]), some kind
of STABILITY section describing how there isn't any and suggesting ways
the user can attain more stability via configuration seems to be a good
idea.
[1]: https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2021-October/002422.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 0:06 Stability of git-archive, breaking (?) the Github universe, and a possible solution Eli Schwartz
2023-01-31 7:49 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-01-31 9:11 ` Eli Schwartz
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 0/9] git archive: use gzip again by default, document output stabilty Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 1/9] archive & tar config docs: de-duplicate configuration section Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 2/9] git config docs: document "tar.<format>.{command,remote}" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] archiver API: make the "flags" in "struct archiver" an enum Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 4/9] archive: omit the shell for built-in "command" filters Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 5/9] archive-tar.c: move internal gzip implementation to a function Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 6/9] archive: use "gzip -cn" for stability, not "git archive gzip" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 7/9] test-lib.sh: add a lazy GZIP prerequisite Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 8/9] archive tests: test for "gzip -cn" and "git archive gzip" stability Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 9/9] git archive docs: document output non-stability Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 10:25 ` brian m. carlson
2023-02-02 10:30 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-04 17:46 ` brian m. carlson
2023-02-02 16:17 ` [PATCH 0/9] git archive: use gzip again by default, document output stabilty Phillip Wood
2023-02-02 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-03 13:49 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-06 14:46 ` Phillip Wood
2023-02-03 15:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-02-02 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-04 18:08 ` René Scharfe
2023-02-05 21:30 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-12 17:41 ` René Scharfe
2023-02-02 19:23 ` Raymond E. Pasco [this message]
2023-02-03 8:06 ` [PATCH] archive: document output stability concerns Raymond E. Pasco
2023-01-31 9:54 ` Stability of git-archive, breaking (?) the Github universe, and a possible solution brian m. carlson
2023-01-31 11:31 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-01-31 15:05 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-01-31 22:32 ` brian m. carlson
2023-02-01 9:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-01 11:34 ` demerphq
2023-02-01 12:21 ` Michal Suchánek
2023-02-01 12:48 ` demerphq
2023-02-01 13:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-01 15:21 ` demerphq
2023-02-01 18:56 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-02-02 21:19 ` Joey Hess
2023-02-03 4:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-02-03 13:32 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-01 23:16 ` brian m. carlson
2023-02-01 23:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-02 23:01 ` brian m. carlson
2023-02-02 23:47 ` rsbecker
2023-02-03 13:18 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-02 0:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-01 12:17 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2023-01-31 15:56 ` Eli Schwartz
2023-01-31 16:20 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-01-31 16:34 ` Eli Schwartz
2023-01-31 20:34 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-01-31 20:45 ` Michal Suchánek
2023-02-01 1:33 ` brian m. carlson
2023-02-01 12:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-01 23:18 ` brian m. carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de8f1e338e6ee99cd3ee06b16f1edbce@ameretat.dev \
--to=ray@ameretat.dev \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=demerphq@gmail.com \
--cc=eschwartz93@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).