From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] rebase --onto detection of already applied commits
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:07:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e174b4a6-f5c2-6856-23bf-216cbab86fbf@dunelm.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee59112a-bd07-53cc-dfe3-6ee6f2342287@collabora.com>
On 15/12/2022 16:02, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
> On 12/15/22 17:40, Phillip Wood wrote:
>> Hi Cristian
>>
>> On 13/12/2022 15:34, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> Hi Phillip,
>>>
>>> On 12/13/22 15:04, Phillip Wood wrote:
>>>> Hi Christian
>>>>
>>>> On 13/12/2022 10:37, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>>> Currently '--onto' works as if the user provided the
>>>>> '--reapply-cherry-picks' flag,
>>>>
>>>> --onto does not affect the cherry-pick detection. When running
>>>>
>>>> git rebase --onto new-base upstream feature
>>>>
>>>> any commits in upstream have been cherry-picked from feature they
>>>> will not be rebased. What it does not do is look for cherry-picks in
>>>> onto...feature. It would be nice to add that but I'm not sure it is
>>>> straight forward to do so and still exclude commits that have been
>>>> cherry-picked from feature to upstream.
>>>
>>> The proposed patch enables looking for commits into new-base..feature
>>> range and excluding the ones reachable from upstream. Since this is a
>>> change in the existing behavior, we might need to introduce a new
>>> flag to enable it. I previously suggested to use
>>> '--no-reapply-cherry-picks' for this purpose, but now it's pretty
>>> obvious this will be a source of confusion, since the "cherry-picks"
>>> term refers to the commits picked from feature to upstream instead of
>>> new-base, as you already mentioned.
>>>
>>> I agree it would be nice to support both exclusion ranges, but I'm
>>> not sure how complicated the implementation would be, since I don't
>>> have any previous experience with the Git internals. Could this be
>>> added as a separate feature at a later point?
>>
>> If we can I'd rather add code that excludes cherry-pick both ranges.
>> To remove the cherry-picks that are in upstream and new-base you could
>> rework the todo list generation as follows
>>
>> 1. Calculate the merge-base $mb of feature and upstream
>> 2. Store the list of commits $mb..feature in an array and in a hash
>> table indexed their patch-id.
>> 3. Walk $mb..upstream calculating the patch-id for each commit and
>> removing any commit in the list from step 2 that matches.
>> 4. If onto is equal to upstream skip to step 7
>> 5. Calculate the merge-base $mb of feature and onto.
>> 6. Walk $mb..new-base calculating the patch-id for each commit and
>> removing any commit in the list from step 2 that matches.
>> 7. Generate the todo list using the modified list of commits from step
>> 2.
>>
>> I don't have much time at the moment but I can try and help a bit more
>> in the New Year if you want.
>
> Thank you for the implementation hints and your availability to help
> further! I will try to put this in practice and let you know as soon as
> I get something working.
I'd start by looking at the existing todo list generation in
sequencer.c:sequencer_make_script()
Best Wishes
Phillip
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-15 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-12 11:35 [RFC PATCH 0/1] rebase --onto detection of already applied commits Cristian Ciocaltea
2022-12-12 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] rebase --onto: Skip previously " Cristian Ciocaltea
2022-12-12 12:27 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-12 15:37 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2022-12-13 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] rebase --onto detection of already " Junio C Hamano
2022-12-13 10:37 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2022-12-13 12:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-12-13 13:04 ` Phillip Wood
2022-12-13 15:34 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2022-12-15 15:40 ` Phillip Wood
2022-12-15 16:02 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2022-12-15 17:07 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e174b4a6-f5c2-6856-23bf-216cbab86fbf@dunelm.org.uk \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).