From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D400C433EF for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240204AbiCNMDs (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:03:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41422 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240349AbiCNMCt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:02:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF67449264 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 05:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host-84-13-159-41.opaltelecom.net ([84.13.159.41] helo=[192.168.1.37]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1nTjLw-00016f-50; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:59:08 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:59:07 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: Dealing with corporate email recycling Content-Language: en-GB To: Sean Allred Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sallred@epic.com, grmason@epic.com, sconrad@epic.com References: <878rtebxk0.fsf@gmail.com> <27b5bf20-2eb5-7873-4fdd-875aa699862c@iee.email> <874k42ar61.fsf@gmail.com> From: Philip Oakley In-Reply-To: <874k42ar61.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 13/03/2022 13:35, Sean Allred wrote: > It's worth noting > that, if we do have to use this generated mapping, a mapping of over 10k > entries is surely to have the odd mistake every now and then. So it's > not *totally* trustworthy (and never could be). I'd agree there. Adding role based mailboxes will further complicate such mappings. Philip