From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Cc: "Martin Ågren" <martin.agren@gmail.com>,
"Kevin Daudt" <me@ikke.info>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintenance: specify explicit stdin for crontab
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:38:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f876cbad-ec12-6ee0-ede2-8f439ad4ad34@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330174333.GJ15354@pobox.com>
On 3/30/2021 1:43 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Derrick Stolee wrote:
>> On 3/30/2021 1:41 AM, Martin Ågren wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 23:23, Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There are multiple crontab implementations that require stdin for
>>>> editing a crontab to be explicitly specified as '-'.
>
> Amusingly, I wrote the exact same patch 2 weeks ago
> (including not dropping the `argc == 2` which Martin
> mentioned). That was in response to a report in the Fedora
> bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1939930
>
> I thought cronie might be rather rare with it's non-POSIX
> handling of crontab without arguments.
Thanks for this link! I appreciate the context.
> In the end, the cronie folks upstream adjusted things so
> that crontab behaves as defined by POSIX if stdin is not a
> TTY:
>
> https://github.com/cronie-crond/cronie/commit/8b0241f
>> That allows cronie to behave more sensibly for interactive
> use without breaking tools like git maintenance. And it let
> me sidestep proposing a patch to git (or worse, maintaining
> it in the Fedora packages).
Nice!
> But I didn't dig in to find out whether or how many other
> crontab implemntations had also eschewed the (rather poor)
> POSIX-confirming behavior. Knowing there are several among
> popular OS's makes it easy to see something like this patch
> being generally useful.
>
> Though, as Derrick notes below, we would break systems which
> implement crontab strictly per the POSIX spec. I don't know
> how many crontab's don't accept `-`.
>
> At the time, I checked on an older OmniOS system I had
> access to (based on Illumos/OpenSolaris) and it did not
> accept `-`. So my quick sample size of 3 (Fedora, CentOS,
> and OmniOS) I had a 1/3 failure rate.
>
>> Thank you for reporting this, especially with a patch!
>>
>> However, I'm not sure about this adding of '-' being something that
>> crontab ignores so commonly. My Ubuntu machine reports this:
>>
>> $ crontab -e -
>> crontab: usage error: no arguments permitted after this option
>> usage: crontab [-u user] file
>> crontab [ -u user ] [ -i ] { -e | -l | -r }
>> (default operation is replace, per 1003.2)
>> -e (edit user's crontab)
>> -l (list user's crontab)
>> -r (delete user's crontab)
>> -i (prompt before deleting user's crontab)
>>
>> Is there a way we could attempt writing over stdin, notice the
>> failure, then retry with the '-' option?
>
> You'd skip the `-e` there, no? Running `crontab -` in a
> current ubuntu container with the cron package installed
> (what looks like vixie-cron-3.0pl1) works as expected.
Yes, this is my mistake. My machine supports "crontab -".
> Perhaps a Makefile knob to allow systems with such a crontab
> to adjust the behavior would be an alternative to detecting
> and retrying?
>
> NEEDS_CRONTAB_STDIN_OPT or something like that, with
> config.mak.uname to override whichever default is chosen.
> Whether that's a better option really depends on how much
> effort it is to add and maintain the detection in the code
> weighed against how many systems would need to have the
> default changed.
>
> Mildy related, I wonder whether we'll eventually see a patch
> to use systemd timers instead of cron (optionally, of
> course). Fedora, for example, doesn't install crond by
> default anymore. (Though, warts and all, I still prefer
> crond myself.)
Perhaps the best way to approach this is to try adding '-'
by default, and remove it and try again on a failure. If the
usage is actually a problem, that first command should fail
quickly. I'm not sure if we could rely upon a specific
category of error codes or if we should just say "non-zero
exit means retry".
Thanks!
-Stolee
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-29 21:09 [PATCH] maintenance: specify explicit stdin for crontab Kevin Daudt
2021-03-30 5:41 ` Martin Ågren
2021-03-30 12:02 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-03-30 17:12 ` Kevin Daudt
2021-03-30 19:32 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-03-30 17:43 ` Todd Zullinger
2021-03-30 19:38 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f876cbad-ec12-6ee0-ede2-8f439ad4ad34@gmail.com \
--to=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.agren@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ikke.info \
--cc=tmz@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).