git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com,
	Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:03:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc1db75c-868c-08c6-7087-b70460653460@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtubnf568.fsf@gitster.g>

On 3/24/2022 4:48 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

>> All existing tests continue to pass with this change. There was one
>> instance from t7700-repack.sh that was taking advantage of this
>> flexibility, but it was removed in the previous change.
> 
> Of course all existing tests continue to pass, as we no longer have
> any user of test_subcommand_inexact after the previous step ;-).

Yeah, I definitely should have checked to see if there were other
uses of this. I thought there was, but I was mistaken.

> Among
> 
>  (1) doing nothing,
>  (2) removing, and
>  (3) clarifying the implementation,
> 
> my preference would be 2 > 1 > 3.  If we add

I agree that (2) is the best option here.
 
>  (4) clarify the implementation and document what kind of inexactness we
>      tolerate with an updated comment"
> 
> to the mix, that would come before all 3 others, though.

Is there value in fixing the implementation and adding this comment
if we are to just delete the helper? I suppose that we could prevent
a future contribution from reintroducing the broken implementation.
 
> Perhaps squash something like this in?
> 
>  t/test-lib-functions.sh | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git i/t/test-lib-functions.sh w/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> index 0f439c99d6..6f6afae847 100644
> --- i/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> +++ w/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> @@ -1789,8 +1789,8 @@ test_subcommand () {
>  }
>  
>  # Check that the given command was invoked as part of the
> -# trace2-format trace on stdin, but without an exact set of
> -# arguments.
> +# trace2-format trace on stdin, but only require that the
> +# initial arguments are given as specified.

This is an accurate description of what the fixed implementation
does.

My current feeling is that we should just delete this and refer
to that deletion if anyone considers needing something like it.

Thanks,
-Stolee

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-25 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-21 20:34 [PATCH] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-22 15:17 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-23 14:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-23 14:55     ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-23 21:45       ` Taylor Blau
2022-03-23 23:10         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-24 15:42           ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-24 16:02             ` Taylor Blau
2022-03-24 16:39               ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-24 16:38             ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-24 18:10     ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-03-25  0:33       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-25  8:13         ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-03-24 18:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-24 18:34   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t7700: check post-condition in kept-pack test Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-24 18:58     ` Taylor Blau
2022-03-25 13:55       ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-25 17:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-25 17:23       ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-25 17:36         ` Taylor Blau
2022-03-25 18:22           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-24 18:34   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-24 18:49     ` Taylor Blau
2022-03-24 20:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-25 14:03       ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2022-03-25 17:25         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-25 19:02   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-25 19:02     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t7700: check post-condition in kept-pack test Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-25 19:02     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] test-lib-functions: remove test_subcommand_inexact Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-30  2:44     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] test-lib-functions: fix test_subcommand_inexact Taylor Blau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc1db75c-868c-08c6-7087-b70460653460@github.com \
    --to=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).