git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, szeder.dev@gmail.com, peff@peff.net,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] repack: teach --no-prune-packed to skip `git prune-packed`
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 16:15:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gohp6kr1j8nmdv.fsf@cpm12071.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414235027.4064035-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>


Thanks for reviewing this patch. really appreciate it.

However, in the v2, I decided to drop this in favor of just adding a
trace2 event that emits all the loosened objects. This is to avoid
adding user-visible option just for the sake of testing it.

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:

>> The `git repack -d` command will remove any packfile that becomes
>> redundant after repacking, and then call  `git pruned-packed` for
>> pruning any unpacked objects.
>
> s/pruned-packed/prune-packed/ (note that there is no "d" after "prune")
> throughout this commit message.
>
> Also, if there are any objects pruned, they are packed objects, not
> unpacked objects. Maybe better to say "...for pruning any objects
> already in packs".
>

Thanks for catching the typo and the clarification.

>> diff --git a/t/t7700-repack.sh b/t/t7700-repack.sh
>> index 25b235c063..728a16ad97 100755
>> --- a/t/t7700-repack.sh
>> +++ b/t/t7700-repack.sh
>> @@ -127,12 +127,7 @@ test_expect_success 'packed unreachable obs in alternate ODB are not loosened' '
>>  	git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
>>  	test_tick &&
>>  	git reflog expire --expire=$test_tick --expire-unreachable=$test_tick --all &&
>> -	# The pack-objects call on the next line is equivalent to
>> -	# git repack -A -d without the call to prune-packed
>> -	git pack-objects --honor-pack-keep --non-empty --all --reflog \
>> -	    --unpack-unreachable </dev/null pack &&
>> -	rm -f .git/objects/pack/* &&
>> -	mv pack-* .git/objects/pack/ &&
>> +	git repack -A -d --no-prune-packed &&
>
> This is great!
>

Unfortunately, with the drop of this patch in v2, we no longer refactor
these tests. However, this still might be possible with the trace2 event
information that is now-added in the v2. Of course, if this doesn't
impact or weakens the test in anyway.

>> +test_expect_success '-A -d and --no-prune-packed do not remove loose objects' '
>> +	test_create_repo repo &&
>> +	test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" &&
>> +	test_commit -C repo commit &&
>> +	git -C repo repack -A -d --no-prune-packed &&
>> +	git -C repo count-objects -v >out &&
>> +	grep "^prune-packable: 3" out
>> +'
>
> As for the test description, I would prefer "...do not remove loose
> objects already in packs".

Yes, this is an improvement of the test description. 

-- 
Thanks
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-18 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-03  9:04 rather slow 'git repack' in 'blob:none' partial clones SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-05  1:02 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-07 21:17   ` Jeff King
2021-04-08  0:02     ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-08  0:35       ` Jeff King
2021-04-12  7:09     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-12 21:36     ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-12 21:49       ` Bryan Turner
2021-04-12 23:51         ` Jeff King
2021-04-12 23:47       ` Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:12         ` [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:15           ` [PATCH 1/3] is_promisor_object(): free tree buffer after parsing Jeff King
2021-04-13 20:17             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-14  5:18               ` Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:16           ` [PATCH 2/3] lookup_unknown_object(): take a repository argument Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:17           ` [PATCH 3/3] revision: avoid parsing with --exclude-promisor-objects Jeff King
2021-04-13 20:22             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-13 18:10           ` [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-14 17:14           ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-14 19:22           ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-13 18:05         ` rather slow 'git repack' in 'blob:none' partial clones SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-14  5:14           ` Jeff King
2021-04-11 10:59   ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-12  7:53     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14   ` [PATCH 1/2] repack: teach --no-prune-packed to skip `git prune-packed` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 23:50     ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-18 14:15       ` Rafael Silva [this message]
2021-04-14 19:14   ` [PATCH 2/2] repack: avoid loosening promisor pack objects in partial clones Rafael Silva
2021-04-15  1:04     ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-15  3:51       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15  9:03         ` Jeff King
2021-04-15  9:05       ` Jeff King
2021-04-18  7:12       ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-15 18:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-18  8:40       ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 22:10   ` [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15  9:15   ` Jeff King
2021-04-18  8:20     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-18 13:57   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Rafael Silva
2021-04-18 13:57     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] repack: avoid loosening promisor objects in partial clones Rafael Silva
2021-04-19 19:15       ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-21 18:54         ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-19 23:09       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-21 19:25         ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-21 19:32     ` [PATCH v3] " Rafael Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=gohp6kr1j8nmdv.fsf@cpm12071.fritz.box \
    --to=rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).