From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabien Subject: Re: Is git over http (git-http-push) ready for production ? Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:08:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20100219140419.GB31796@Knoppix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 19 16:09:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiUTt-0001zW-R5 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:09:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754017Ab0BSPJU (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:09:20 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56593 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751687Ab0BSPJT (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:09:19 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiUTl-0001ve-Tx for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:09:17 +0100 Received: from lamppc10.epfl.ch ([128.178.154.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:09:17 +0100 Received: from fabien.ubuntu by lamppc10.epfl.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:09:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lamppc10.epfl.ch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20090319) In-Reply-To: <20100219140419.GB31796@Knoppix> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > 1.6.6 introduced Smart HTTP. It is much more efficient, can run hooks and > has same kind of atomicity guarantees as ssh://, but it has few shorcomings: > > - Requires server support (CGI script & Git 1.6.6+) > - Hook messages don't work (at least with 1.6.6.X/1.7.0.X) > - Requires 1.6.6+ on client side > - Authentication still sucks (no surprise, auth with HTTP just plain sucks). Ok, thanks ! I wasn't aware of this new feature. I'll give it a try. What do you mean by "Hook messages don't work" ? Thanks. -- Fabien