From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marat Radchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Un-pessimize "diff-index $commit -- $pathspec" Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 06:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <7vty9054qr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <1314653603-7533-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com> <7v1uw36fgb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vfwkj4wff.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 30 08:16:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyHcl-0004yV-S6 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:16:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751317Ab1H3GQT (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:16:19 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47512 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751085Ab1H3GQS (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:16:18 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyHcO-0004sf-Hr for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:16:17 +0200 Received: from 195.218.191.171 ([195.218.191.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:16:16 +0200 Received: from marat by 195.218.191.171 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:16:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 195.218.191.171 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.112 Safari/534.30) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano pobox.com> writes: > Marat, if/when you have a chance could you try a patched git on your > original use case and see if it produces correct output with shorter > amount of time? 30s without patch and 0.3s with it. You rock :)