Re: Feature: git stash pop --always-drop

[Ed Avis <eda@waniasset.com>]

>
Yes, my use case is that I get confused about whether the stash has been
dropped or not and whether I might have stashed something else in the
meantime.  So for me plain 'git stash drop' feels a bit dangerous.

Jeff King <peff <at> peff.net> writes:

>I also wondered if the "dropped" message is
>sufficiently clear to new users. The point of it, I think, is to allow a
>final "oops, I didn't mean to do that" moment. But there are no
>instructions for how one would re-create the same stash.

Right - myself I didn't even realize that recreating the stash was possible
(though I was vaguely aware that old stashes float around somewhere until
they are garbage collected many months later).

git stash is a relatively infrequent operation and quite exotic, so it
wouldn't hurt to add lots of chatter to it.

>>Another feature I would like to see is a kind of atomic stash apply, 

>I think that may be a bit harder, as the merge machinery would have to
>know how to be atomic.

If git merge-recursive had a --dry-run flag that might take care of it.

-- 
Ed Avis <eda@waniasset.com>