git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Ben Wijen <ben@wijen.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Pratik Karki <predatoramigo@gmail.com>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
	Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] rebase.c: make sure the active branch isn't moved when autostashing
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:27:29 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1908221418540.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190821182941.12674-2-ben@wijen.net>

Hi Ben,

On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Ben Wijen wrote:

> Consider the following scenario:
>     git checkout not-the-master
>     work work work
>     git rebase --autostash upstream master
>
> Here 'rebase --autostash <upstream> <branch>' incorrectly moves the
> active branch (not-the-master) to master (before the rebase).
>
> The expected behavior: (58794775:/git-rebase.sh:526)
>     AUTOSTASH=$(git stash create autostash)
>     git reset --hard
>     git checkout master
>     git rebase upstream
>     git stash apply $AUTOSTASH
>
> The actual behavior: (6defce2b:/builtin/rebase.c:1062)
>     AUTOSTASH=$(git stash create autostash)
>     git reset --hard master
>     git checkout master
>     git rebase upstream
>     git stash apply $AUTOSTASH

Interesting. So the only difference is that the original rebase called
`git reset --hard` on the current HEAD, while the new behavior tries to
reset to the branch to which the user wants to switch, right away.

I can see that this would lead to possible problems e.g. if a file had
been added between master and the current branch.

> This commit reinstates the 'legacy script' behavior as introduced with
> 58794775: rebase: implement --[no-]autostash and rebase.autostash
>
> As with this commit the reset must never change the active branch,
> the 'HEAD is now at ...' message has now been removed.

Actually, I am not so sure that I like this change.

Previously, users had a chance to figure out to which revision the
worktree was reset, before switching the branch (because switching the
branch we _do_, via `git checkout master`).

> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> index 670096c065..a928f44941 100644
> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> @@ -1968,9 +1968,6 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  				state_dir_path("autostash", &options);
>  			struct child_process stash = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
>  			struct object_id oid;
> -			struct commit *head =
> -				lookup_commit_reference(the_repository,
> -							&options.orig_head);

This should probably be changed to look up `HEAD` instead, then, so that
we can keep the message.

I.e. you probably want to use `get_oid("HEAD", &head_oid)` instead.

>  			argv_array_pushl(&stash.args,
>  					 "stash", "create", "autostash", NULL);
> @@ -1991,17 +1988,14 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  				    options.state_dir);
>  			write_file(autostash, "%s", oid_to_hex(&oid));
>  			printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
> -			if (reset_head(&head->object.oid, "reset --hard",
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * We might not be on orig_head yet:
> +			 * Make sure to reset w/o switching branches...
> +			 */
> +			if (reset_head(NULL, "reset --hard",
>  				       NULL, RESET_HEAD_HARD, NULL, NULL) < 0)
>  				die(_("could not reset --hard"));
> -			printf(_("HEAD is now at %s"),
> -			       find_unique_abbrev(&head->object.oid,
> -						  DEFAULT_ABBREV));
> -			strbuf_reset(&buf);
> -			pp_commit_easy(CMIT_FMT_ONELINE, head, &buf);
> -			if (buf.len > 0)
> -				printf(" %s", buf.buf);
> -			putchar('\n');
>
>  			if (discard_index(the_repository->index) < 0 ||
>  				repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
> diff --git a/t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh b/t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh
> index b8f4d03467..d1352096f2 100755
> --- a/t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh
> +++ b/t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh
> @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ test_expect_success setup '
>  create_expected_success_am () {
>  	cat >expected <<-EOF
>  	$(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
> -	HEAD is now at $(git rev-parse --short feature-branch) third commit
>  	First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
>  	Applying: second commit
>  	Applying: third commit
> @@ -48,7 +47,6 @@ create_expected_success_am () {
>  create_expected_success_interactive () {
>  	q_to_cr >expected <<-EOF
>  	$(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
> -	HEAD is now at $(git rev-parse --short feature-branch) third commit
>  	Applied autostash.
>  	Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch.
>  	EOF
> @@ -57,7 +55,6 @@ create_expected_success_interactive () {
>  create_expected_failure_am () {
>  	cat >expected <<-EOF
>  	$(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
> -	HEAD is now at $(git rev-parse --short feature-branch) third commit
>  	First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
>  	Applying: second commit
>  	Applying: third commit
> @@ -70,7 +67,6 @@ create_expected_failure_am () {
>  create_expected_failure_interactive () {
>  	cat >expected <<-EOF
>  	$(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
> -	HEAD is now at $(git rev-parse --short feature-branch) third commit
>  	Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.
>  	Your changes are safe in the stash.
>  	You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time.
> @@ -306,4 +302,16 @@ test_expect_success 'branch is left alone when possible' '
>  	test unchanged-branch = "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)"
>  '
>
> +test_expect_success 'never change active branch' '
> +	git checkout -b upstream unrelated-onto-branch &&
> +	test_when_finished "
> +		git reset --hard &&
> +		git checkout - &&
> +		git branch -D upstream" &&

I feel like we want to have a more meaningful branch name than
"upstream", and then we can get away with leaving it in place, i.e. just

	test_when_finished "git reset --hard && git checkout -" &&

> +	echo changed >file0 &&
> +	git add file0 &&

Since `file0` is already tracked, I think that this `git add` invocation
only distracts from the essence of this test case.

> +	git rebase --autostash upstream feature-branch &&
> +	test_cmp_rev upstream unrelated-onto-branch

Otherwise: well done! And thank you so much for fixing this.

Ciao,
Dscho

> +'
> +
>  test_done
> --
> 2.22.0
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-22 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-18  9:53 [PATCH 0/2] git rebase: Make sure upstream branch is left alone Ben Wijen
2019-08-18  9:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] t3420: never change upstream branch Ben Wijen
2019-08-19 21:55   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-20  8:58   ` Phillip Wood
2019-08-18  9:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] rebase.c: make sure current branch isn't moved when autostashing Ben Wijen
2019-08-20  9:00   ` Phillip Wood
2019-08-20 19:53     ` Ben
2019-08-20 20:12   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] git rebase: Make sure upstream branch is left alone Ben Wijen
2019-08-20 20:12     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] rebase.c: make sure current branch isn't moved when autostashing Ben Wijen
2019-08-20 20:24       ` Eric Sunshine
2019-08-20 20:58       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-21 18:29     ` [PATCH v3 0/1] rebase.c: make sure the active " Ben Wijen
2019-08-21 18:29       ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Ben Wijen
2019-08-22 12:27         ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2019-08-22 15:49           ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-26 16:45       ` [PATCH v4 " Ben Wijen
2019-08-26 16:45         ` Ben Wijen
2019-08-26 17:10           ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-08-28 12:56         ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-08-28 15:34           ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-28 16:03             ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-29 16:47         ` [PATCH v5 0/2] rebase.c: make sure current " Ben Wijen
2019-08-29 16:47           ` [PATCH v5 1/2] builtin/rebase.c: make sure the active " Ben Wijen
2019-08-29 16:47           ` [PATCH v5 2/2] builtin/rebase.c: Remove pointless message Ben Wijen
2019-08-30 15:16           ` [PATCH v6 0/2] rebase.c: make sure current branch isn't moved when autostashing Ben Wijen
2019-08-30 15:16             ` [PATCH v6 1/2] builtin/rebase.c: make sure the active " Ben Wijen
2019-08-30 20:15               ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-31  7:17                 ` Ben
2019-09-01 16:01                   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-01 16:27                     ` Ben
2019-09-02 17:33                       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-30 15:16             ` [PATCH v6 2/2] builtin/rebase.c: Remove pointless message Ben Wijen
2019-08-30 20:16               ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-31  7:17                 ` Ben
2019-08-30 15:16             ` [PATCH " Ben Wijen
2019-08-19  9:26 ` [PATCH 0/2] git rebase: Make sure upstream branch is left alone Phillip Wood
2019-08-19 15:33   ` Ben
2019-08-19 18:21     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1908221418540.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
    --to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=ben@wijen.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=predatoramigo@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).