From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Victoria Dye" <vdye@github.com>,
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Derrick Stolee" <derrickstolee@github.com>,
"Emily Shaffer" <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 14:58:37 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2205231455200.352@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqfsl1bcy6.fsf@gitster.g>
Hi Junio,
On Sun, 22 May 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > I see that this is still with the previous iteration, and therefore
> > exposes the same speed (or slowness) as was investigated so wonderfully by
> > Victoria.
> >
> > So I really do not understand why you pointed to that run, given that it
>
> Simply because your updated version came to my tree a lot after I
> prepared two trees that are otherwise identical for comparison to
> write the message you are responding to.
Oh sorry, I only noticed that your mail came in after I sent the new
iteration, and I incorrectly thought that you had put the patch series
into the Stalled/To-Drop pile, so I assumed that your mail was in response
to my new iteration.
I had missed that you replied to v2 instead of to v3.
> I do not appreciate that you have to always talk back to others in
> such an aggressive tone
I apologize for that. As you might have guessed, it was not my intention
to be aggressive in any way. I merely meant to express my puzzlement, and
your explanation resolved that very nicely.
Thank you,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-24 18:56 [PATCH 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 1/9] ci: fix code style Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] ci/run-build-and-tests: take a more high-level view Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-24 23:22 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-01-25 14:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] ci: make it easier to find failed tests' logs in the GitHub workflow Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-25 23:48 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] ci/run-build-and-tests: add some structure to the GitHub workflow output Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-02-23 12:13 ` Phillip Wood
2022-02-25 13:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] tests: refactor --write-junit-xml code Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-26 0:10 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] test(junit): avoid line feeds in XML attributes Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] ci: optionally mark up output in the GitHub workflow Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 8/9] ci: use `--github-workflow-markup` " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-24 18:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] ci: call `finalize_test_case_output` a little later Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-01-26 0:25 ` [PATCH 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-27 16:31 ` CI "grouping" within jobs v.s. lighter split-out jobs (was: [PATCH 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-19 23:46 ` [PATCH 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful Johannes Schindelin
2022-02-20 2:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-20 15:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-02-21 8:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-22 10:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-02-20 12:47 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-22 10:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-02-22 13:31 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-23 12:07 ` Phillip Wood
2022-02-25 12:39 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-25 14:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-02-25 18:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-26 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01 2:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01 6:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01 10:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-01 16:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01 10:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-01 16:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01 10:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-04 7:38 ` win+VS environment has "cut" but not "paste"? Junio C Hamano
2022-03-04 9:04 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 15:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-07 17:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 13:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-10 15:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 15:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-07 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-02 10:58 ` [PATCH 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful Phillip Wood
2022-03-07 16:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-07 17:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 11:44 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 17:12 ` Phillip Wood
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ci: fix code style Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] ci/run-build-and-tests: take a more high-level view Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ci: make it easier to find failed tests' logs in the GitHub workflow Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] ci/run-build-and-tests: add some structure to the GitHub workflow output Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] tests: refactor --write-junit-xml code Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] test(junit): avoid line feeds in XML attributes Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] ci: optionally mark up output in the GitHub workflow Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ci: use `--github-workflow-markup` " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ci: call `finalize_test_case_output` a little later Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful Junio C Hamano
2022-03-02 12:22 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 15:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-07 16:05 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 10:56 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-09 13:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-09 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 19:47 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-25 0:48 ` Victoria Dye
2022-03-25 9:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-25 18:38 ` Victoria Dye
2022-05-21 21:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-21 23:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-22 18:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-22 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-23 12:58 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2022-05-22 23:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-23 18:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-23 19:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-23 9:05 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-23 18:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-24 8:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ci: fix code style Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] tests: refactor --write-junit-xml code Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] test(junit): avoid line feeds in XML attributes Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ci/run-build-and-tests: take a more high-level view Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ci: make it easier to find failed tests' logs in the GitHub workflow Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ci/run-build-and-tests: add some structure to the GitHub workflow output Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ci: optionally mark up output in the GitHub workflow Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ci(github): skip the logs of the successful test cases Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-24 10:47 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ci(github): avoid printing test case preamble twice Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ci: use `--github-workflow-markup` in the GitHub workflow Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ci(github): mention where the full logs can be found Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ci: call `finalize_test_case_output` a little later Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2205231455200.352@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).