Hi Neeraj,

On Thu, 19 May 2022, Neeraj Singh wrote:

> On 5/19/2022 2:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> >
> > > nksingh85@gmail.com writes:
> > >
> > > > From: Neeraj Singh <neerajsi@microsoft.com>
> > > >
> > > > GGG closed this series erroneously, so I'm trying out
> > > > git-send-email. Apologies for any mistakes.
> > > >
> > > > This series is also available at
> > > > https://github.com/neerajsi-msft/git/git.git ns/batched-fsync-v6.
> > > >
> > > > V6 changes:
> >
> > We haven't heard anything on this topic from anybody for this round.
> > I am planning to merge it to 'next' soonish.
> >
> > Please speak up if anybody has concerns.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> No updates on my end. I'll keep my eyes out for any reports of regression.

I asked a colleague to have a go with these patches and the only concern I
heard back was that with ext4's new `fast_commit` feature, the `fsync`
seems not to actually flush all metadata. They indicated that they'd be
happy with merely documenting this issue, and also pointed out that the
`fast_commit` feature seems still not to be considered ready for
production workloads.

So: 👍 from my side.

Ciao,
Dscho