From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6255C433DB for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD8764F8D for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229721AbhCKR3f (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:29:35 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:53116 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229663AbhCKR3E (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:29:04 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F3312A91A; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:29:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=NkUWZrrzUVttej8gSMqfDyQ/woQ=; b=xx+WLc d9RImj54laE/EYkd6ANMdN+CGMO0KndUEXhz3rAe9PjI/drFordf+u1Jxm+oCcKW DOcIDxqu9WmWbl28DsKA480+aquOtGd+kd5wNnDT1YzvLG0mOwpLytQQMYkDs3mf SrKj/jZ31nGXXv50FgWwUtONaSsGzo31G8o9s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Cvs8f1+mFn/3fDjPETvIoSstTNhAdvFR 470keQh5fj8f9wctBEx7Q81f8I74AaNV6SWZ1Jk5aAbnkWmnRojPiow2edLIfZ01 u6zPxESgYKqvhxzMYXsHEOsmDKwXO+9nIxlG9/pvJ4IWEkCzUN/9hBk6L+p1Aut3 i2/kzafwqtE= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B9C12A919; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:29:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1683712A916; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:29:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Brandon Casey , ZheNing Hu Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GSOC] commit: provides multiple common signatures References: Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:28:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: (ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:16:08 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 44CB9CB8-828F-11EB-8077-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" writes: > From: ZheNing Hu > > Similar to "Helped-by", "Reported-by", "Reviewed-by", "Mentored-by" > these signatures are often seen in git commit messages. After > referring to the simple implementation of `commit --signoff` > and `send-email -cc=" commiter "`, I am considering > whether to provide multiple signature parameters from the > command line. > + ... > + >file6 && > + git add file6 && > + git commit -H "foo " \ > + -R "foo2 " \ > + -M "foo3 " \ > + -r "foo4 " -s -m "thank you" && Firm NAK. Especially, not in this form that squats on short-and-sweet single letter option names only to support the convention of this single project (namely, Git). cf. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200824061156.1929850-1-espeer@gmail.com/ Thanks.