From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA71C433DB for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B10260238 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231976AbhBKR77 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:59:59 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:55913 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232676AbhBKR5z (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:57:55 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F95A2693; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:57:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=PQXCdilF93gG sPFtUzux9a26bQI=; b=oQiiwCCRHjTxmlyNRRrto4SQYLHRcTapZTYFg5Fn6Kxa N+RQ5rW6lR8NWp55mD8TyjGiXUiWl6D/T+JavQGGykI33Hq4BfAUZTEdBq0LhiI8 l7QHghq3QUShpCMS5QNqW2FSju5ntzJ2ai0LZeQ85v7Ic8IrzKKPMN1otXQbe2E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wXg+Yn P4U7/Q4wOfmFbTMZoO0TATh6LVq6m7CG/I/O4XkGM0/pYRXkxgS5M8DSJtr2y/ia ZSgvYIaRA1NsiF8HhmB0qvTnQwSK/3iP11lHceaigk/x9mDv3DsN8S5vN7V3dCIS UDD+sYv5XWiYKIcWzu4k60Q2uAt1057Ol7AF8= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C44BA2692; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:57:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCDE9A2691; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:57:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Jeff King , Taylor Blau , git@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Meyer , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rev-list --disk-usage References: <875z2ydd4l.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:57:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: <875z2ydd4l.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:04:26 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9198394C-6C92-11EB-BC67-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: >> I think this is the "narrowly scoped" bit from Junio's response above. >> It would be a bit weird to have an examples section for rev-list that >> only mentions this rather obscure feature. > > I don't think the lack of an EXAMPLES section or the relative obscurity > of the switch should preclude us from adding useful documentation. > > Yes it would feel a bit out of place, but we can always have a > sub-section of EXAMPLES, and we've got to start somewhere. > > In this case I don't see why it couldn't be added to OPTIONS, we've got > some very long discussion there already, and as long as there's a clear > separation in prose from an initial brief discussion of the switch and > further prose it won't be confusing for readers, they can just page pas= t > the details. OK. In any case, [v2] as we have it (with test number relocation) should be good as-is, so I'd start preparing to merge it down to 'next' soonish. Thanks.