From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7663C0015E for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 05:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233386AbjG1FLP (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:11:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57532 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233357AbjG1FLJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:11:09 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173D32D7E for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 22:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB061A29DA; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:10:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ZMl/Lq60ux4a7HdQU9Wnu4DOdyox+lblxSvVTu JV9a0=; b=h7mwDaERm99YjpedEMxgeQzvITrDHbTb1JdcvAdQvmeF8zXA3B5Bim kpjoNhIlKozHIGAobpWhOtcXOLCkF+XiRxqCOa0Axvl5WC7ay3nN1EF3ylN9NtiS zVG36mqVuwNMsNHV4fYQBdD/G0L7y+IV+rf57HwPWw7KPuvudk2Qs= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DBA1A29D9; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:10:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.168.215.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C58571A29D8; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:10:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Linus Arver Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?Torsten_B=C3=B6gershausen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] MyFirstContribution: refrain from self-iterating too much References: <20230122071156.367jwwt3d5txvkl4@tb-raspi4> <20230123175804.2bkcr7yawyz5fhkb@tb-raspi4> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 22:10:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Linus Arver's message of "Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:08:54 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 19566702-2D05-11EE-A0D7-307A8E0A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Arver writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> ... >> >> The inter/range-diff with my v3 was totally useless, but here is to >> show three minor edits I made to Linus's version I am responding to. >> >> * Simplify parenthesized "because it may be the case that". >> >> * As if you were "a" reviewer, as we do not designate "the >> reviewer(s)" to a patch. Anybody can (volunteer to) be a >> reviewer for a patch, and you can be, too. >> >> * Stress that a single polished patch that comes later (because it >> took time to polish) is vastly preferred than flurry of "oops >> this is better" updates. > > All very reasonable and sensible. LGTM, thanks! Thanks.